Lechtman Eli, Balki Indranil, Thomas Kiersten, Chen Kevin, Moody Alan R, Tyrrell Pascal N
1 Department of Medical Imaging,University of Toronto , University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
2 Department of Statistical Sciences,University of Toronto , University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jan;91(1081):20170518. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170518. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Magnetic resonance of the carotid arteries provides important insight into plaque composition and vulnerability in addition to the traditional measure of stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MR imaging as a first-line modality to assess carotid disease and guide management for high-risk patients with <50% stenosis.
Using TreeAge Pro, a cost-effectiveness simulation was conducted comparing two strategies: (a) standard of care first-line carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) with regular follow-up, vs (b) first-line MR assessment of stenosis and intraplaque haemorrhage (MRIPH) in which patients with IPH received annual DUS surveillance and immediate carotid endarterectomy in case of plaque progression.
For patients aged 70 years old, using a first-line MRIPH strategy resulted in a 16.8% relative risk reduction in strokes compared to DUS (0.080 vs 0.097 strokes per patient per lifetime), and an increased quality-adjusted-life years (12.23 vs 12.20) at an increased cost of $897.33 over a patient's lifetime ($5784.53 vs $4887.20 average total cost per patient per lifetime). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $29,744 per quality-adjusted-life years. MRIPH remained cost-effective below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 for 91.8% of sensitivity analyses.
MRIPH was found to be a cost-effective first-line tool to identify asymptomatic patients at high risk for stroke requiring annual surveillance and prompt management. Advances in Knowledge: Using MR imaging as a fist-line method to detect the presence of IPH provides clinically useful and cost-effective information that allows for enhanced risk evaluation and primary stroke prevention.
除了传统的狭窄测量方法外,颈动脉磁共振成像还能深入了解斑块成分和易损性。本研究的目的是评估磁共振成像作为评估颈动脉疾病和指导狭窄程度小于50%的高危患者治疗的一线检查方法的成本效益。
使用TreeAge Pro进行成本效益模拟,比较两种策略:(a) 标准治疗方法,即一线颈动脉双功超声(DUS)并定期随访;(b) 一线磁共振成像评估狭窄和斑块内出血(MRIPH),其中有斑块内出血的患者接受年度DUS监测,若斑块进展则立即进行颈动脉内膜切除术。
对于70岁的患者,与DUS相比,采用一线MRIPH策略可使中风的相对风险降低16.8%(每位患者一生中风发生率为0.080次 vs 0.097次),质量调整生命年增加(12.23 vs 12.20),患者一生成本增加897.33美元(每位患者一生平均总成本为5784.53美元 vs 4887.20美元)。增量成本效益比为每质量调整生命年29,744美元。在91.8%的敏感性分析中,当支付意愿阈值低于50,000美元时,MRIPH仍然具有成本效益。
发现MRIPH是一种具有成本效益的一线工具,可用于识别需要年度监测和及时治疗的无症状中风高危患者。知识进展:使用磁共振成像作为检测斑块内出血的一线方法可提供临床有用且具有成本效益的信息,有助于加强风险评估和原发性中风预防。