Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带断裂后,使用顺应性表面的机械扰动训练与手动扰动训练在膝关节功能表现上无差异。

No difference between mechanical perturbation training with compliant surface and manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after ACL rupture.

作者信息

Nawasreh Zakariya, Logerstedt David, Failla Mathew, Snyder-Mackler Lynn

机构信息

Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.

University of the Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2018 May;36(5):1391-1397. doi: 10.1002/jor.23784. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Abstract

Manual perturbation training improves dynamic knee stability and functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL-rupture). However, it is limited to static standing position and does not allow time-specific perturbations at different phase of functional activities. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether administering mechanical perturbation training including compliant surface provides effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional measures after an acute ACL-rupture. Sixteen level I/II athletes with ACL-ruptures participated in this preliminary study. Eight patients received mechanical (Mechanical) and eight subjects received manual perturbation training (Manual). All patients completed a functional testing (isometric quadriceps strength, single-legged hop tests) and patient-reported measures (Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Global Rating Score (GRS), International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC 2000) at pre- and post-training. 2 × 2 ANOVA was used for data analysis. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for all measures (p > 0.18). Main effects of time were found for single hop (Pre-testing: 85.14% ± 21.07; Post-testing: 92.49% ± 17.55), triple hop (Pre-testing: 84.64% ± 14.17; Post-testing: 96.64% ± 11.14), KOS-ADLS (Pre-testing: 81.13% ± 11.12; Post-testing: 88.63% ± 12.63), GRS (Pre-testing: 68.63% ± 15.73; Post-testing: 78.81% ± 13.85), and IKDC 2000 (Pre-testing: 66.66% ± 9.85; Post-testing: 76.05% ± 14.62) (p < 0.032). Administering mechanical perturbation training using compliant surfaces induce effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after acute ACL-rupture. The clinical significance is both modes of training improve patients' functional-performance and limb-to-limb movement symmetry, and enhancing the patients' self-reported of knee functional measures after ACL rupture. Mechanical perturbation that provides a compliant surface might be utilized as part of the ACL rehabilitation training. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1391-1397, 2018.

摘要

手法扰动训练可改善前交叉韧带断裂(ACL断裂)后的膝关节动态稳定性和功能表现。然而,它仅限于静态站立姿势,且不允许在功能活动的不同阶段进行特定时间的扰动。本研究的目的是调查给予包括顺应性表面的机械扰动训练是否能在急性ACL断裂后对膝关节功能指标产生与手法扰动训练相似的效果。16名ACL断裂的I/II级运动员参与了这项初步研究。8名患者接受机械(Mechanical)扰动训练,8名受试者接受手法扰动训练(Manual)。所有患者在训练前和训练后均完成了功能测试(等长股四头肌力量、单腿跳测试)以及患者报告的测量指标(膝关节结果调查-日常生活活动量表(KOS-ADLS)、整体评分(GRS)、国际膝关节文献委员会2000(IKDC 2000))。采用2×2方差分析进行数据分析。所有测量指标均未发现显著的组×时间交互作用(p>0.18)。发现时间的主效应存在于单腿跳(测试前:85.14%±21.07;测试后:92.49%±17.55)、双腿跳(测试前:84.64%±14.17;测试后:96.64%±11.14)、KOS-ADLS(测试前:81.13%±11.12;测试后:88.63%±12.63)、GRS(测试前:68.63%±15.73;测试后:78.81%±13.85)以及IKDC 2000(测试前:66.66%±9.85;测试后:76.05%±14.62)(p<0.032)。给予使用顺应性表面的机械扰动训练在急性ACL断裂后对膝关节功能表现产生的效果与手法扰动训练相似。其临床意义在于两种训练方式均能改善患者功能表现和肢体间运动对称性,并提高患者ACL断裂后膝关节功能指标的自我报告情况。提供顺应性表面的机械扰动可作为ACL康复训练的一部分加以利用。©2017骨科学研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究杂志》36:1391 - 1397,2018年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e4/5924420/e72ff62056db/nihms921496f1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验