Salman Bulent, Yilmaz Tonguc Utku, Dikmen Kursat, Kaplan Mehmet
Department of General Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
J Vis Surg. 2016 Aug 12;2:141. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.07.21. eCollection 2016.
After technological advances and increased experiences, more complicated surgeries including distal pancreatectomy can be easily performed with acceptable oncologic results, and decreased mortality and morbidity. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has been shown to have several advantages including less blood loss, less hospital stay, less pain. Several studies comparing open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and LDP resulted that both techniques have similar results according to pancreas fistulas, oncological results, costs and operation indications. Morbidity is very low in high volume centers, for this reason at least ten cases should be performed for the learning curve. Several authors remarked important technical points in LDP in order to perform safe and acceptable LDP in several studies. Here in this review, we aimed to overview the results of previous studies about LDP and discuss the technical points of LDP.
随着技术进步和经验积累,包括胰体尾切除术在内的更复杂手术能够轻松实施,且肿瘤学效果良好,死亡率和发病率降低。腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)已显示出多项优势,包括失血少、住院时间短、疼痛轻。多项比较开放胰体尾切除术(ODP)和LDP的研究结果表明,就胰瘘、肿瘤学效果、成本和手术适应症而言,两种技术的结果相似。在高容量中心,发病率非常低,因此为了掌握学习曲线,至少应进行十例手术。几位作者在多项研究中指出了LDP的重要技术要点,以便实施安全且可接受的LDP。在本综述中,我们旨在概述先前关于LDP的研究结果,并讨论LDP的技术要点。