Suppr超能文献

标准临床工具评估的睡眠问题与活动记录仪之间存在临床显著差异。

Clinically significant discrepancies between sleep problems assessed by standard clinical tools and actigraphy.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 27;17(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0653-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sleep disturbances are widespread among nursing home (NH) patients and associated with numerous negative consequences. Identifying and treating them should therefore be of high clinical priority. No prior studies have investigated the degree to which sleep disturbances as detected by actigraphy and by the sleep-related items in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) provide comparable results. Such knowledge is highly needed, since both questionnaires are used in clinical settings and studies use the NPI-NH sleep item to measure sleep disturbances. For this reason, insight into their relative (dis)advantages is valuable.

METHOD

Cross-sectional study of 83 NH patients. Sleep was objectively measured with actigraphy for 7 days, and rated by NH staff with the sleep items in the CSDD and the NPI-NH, and results were compared. McNemar's tests were conducted to investigate whether there were significant differences between the pairs of relevant measures. Cohen's Kappa tests were used to investigate the degree of agreement between the pairs of relevant actigraphy, NPI-NH and CSDD measures. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted for each of the pairs, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were designed as a plot of the true positive rate against the false positive rate for the diagnostic test.

RESULTS

Proxy-raters reported sleep disturbances in 20.5% of patients assessed with NPI-NH and 18.1% (difficulty falling asleep), 43.4% (multiple awakenings) and 3.6% (early morning awakenings) of patients had sleep disturbances assessed with CSDD. Our results showed significant differences (p<0.001) between actigraphy measures and proxy-rated sleep by the NPI-NH and CSDD. Sensitivity and specificity analyses supported these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to actigraphy, proxy-raters clearly underreported NH patients' sleep disturbances as assessed by sleep items in NPI-NH and CSDD. The results suggest that the usefulness of proxy-rater measures of sleep may be questionable and further research is needed into their clinical value. The results highlight the need for NH staff to acquire and act on knowledge about sleep and sleep challenges among NH patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT02238652 ) on July 7th 2014 (6 months after study initiation).

摘要

背景

睡眠障碍在养老院(NH)患者中普遍存在,并与许多负面后果相关。因此,识别和治疗这些问题应该是临床的首要任务。以前没有研究调查过通过活动记录仪和 Cornell 痴呆抑郁量表(CSDD)中的睡眠相关项目以及神经精神疾病 - 养老院版(NPI-NH)中的睡眠项目检测到的睡眠障碍的程度,这些项目提供的结果是否具有可比性。由于这两个问卷都在临床环境中使用,并且研究使用 NPI-NH 的睡眠项目来测量睡眠障碍,因此非常需要了解这方面的知识。因此,了解它们的相对(不)优势是很有价值的。

方法

对 83 名 NH 患者进行横断面研究。使用活动记录仪对睡眠进行了 7 天的客观测量,并由 NH 工作人员使用 CSDD 和 NPI-NH 的睡眠项目进行评分,然后比较结果。采用 McNemar 检验比较相关测量的两两差异是否有统计学意义。采用 Cohen's Kappa 检验评估相关的活动记录仪、NPI-NH 和 CSDD 测量的一致性程度。对每对测量进行了敏感性和特异性分析,并设计了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,作为诊断测试的真阳性率与假阳性率的关系图。

结果

使用 NPI-NH 评估的患者中有 20.5%的患者被代理评估者报告存在睡眠障碍,使用 CSDD 评估的患者中分别有 18.1%(入睡困难)、43.4%(多次醒来)和 3.6%(清晨醒来)的患者存在睡眠障碍。我们的结果显示,活动记录仪测量与代理评估的 NPI-NH 和 CSDD 的睡眠之间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。敏感性和特异性分析支持这些结果。

结论

与活动记录仪相比,代理评估者明显低估了使用 NPI-NH 和 CSDD 中的睡眠项目评估的 NH 患者的睡眠障碍。结果表明,代理评估者测量睡眠的有用性可能存在疑问,需要进一步研究其临床价值。结果强调了 NH 工作人员需要获得和应用有关 NH 患者睡眠和睡眠挑战的知识的必要性。

试验注册

于 2014 年 7 月 7 日(研究开始后 6 个月)在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(注册号:NCT02238652)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Sleep and agitation in nursing home residents with and without dementia.患有和未患痴呆症的养老院居民的睡眠与躁动
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Dec;27(12):1945-55. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001568. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
7
Connections between sleep and cognition in older adults.老年人睡眠与认知的关系。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1017-28. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70172-3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验