• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness.科学的可重复性:造假、影响因子和粗心大意。
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018 Jan;114:364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?科学文献中的撤稿:作者是否故意从事研究欺诈?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
4
[The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].生物医学期刊对错误和科学欺诈的管理:它们无法取代机构
Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
5
[Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].[出版物中的欺诈案例:从达西到波尔德曼斯]
Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
6
[Perception of scientific fraud in the Spanish biomedical journals].
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Dec 23;143(12):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.03.036. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
7
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?科学署名。第一部分。洞察科学欺诈的窗口?
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003.
8
Of predatory publishers and spurious impact factors.关于掠夺性出版商和虚假影响因子
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Aug;24(8):537-8.
9
Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.《巴基斯坦医学科学杂志》因科研不端行为而撤稿。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Aug;26(8):718-9.
10
Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.一起科研欺诈案件中的伦理和法律考量
J Am Coll Dent. 2008 Summer;75(2):29-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroglobin and Cytoglobin in Mammalian Nervous Systems: About Distribution, Regulation, Function, and Some Open Questions.哺乳动物神经系统中的神经球蛋白和细胞球蛋白:关于分布、调节、功能及一些未解决的问题。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 23;15(8):784. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080784.
2
Positive aspects of negative data.阴性数据的积极方面。
J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2022 Sep 28;2:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2022.100016. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Unveiling the ethical void: Bias in reference citations and its academic ramifications.揭示道德空白:参考文献引用中的偏见及其学术影响。
Curr Res Physiol. 2024 Jul 26;7:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100130. eCollection 2024.
4
Predicting hospital length of stay using machine learning on a large open health dataset.利用大型开源健康数据集的机器学习预测住院时间。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11238-y.
5
Disparity between statistical and clinical significance in published randomised controlled trials indexed in PubMed: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological survey.已发表的 PubMed 索引随机对照试验中统计学意义与临床意义的差异:一项横断面方法学调查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 25;14(7):e084375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084375.
6
Journeying towards best practice data management in biodiversity genomics.迈向生物多样性基因组学最佳实践数据管理之路。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Feb;25(2):e13880. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13880. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Mixed effects modeling of radiotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade or inhibitors of the DNA damage response pathway.放疗联合免疫检查点阻断或 DNA 损伤反应通路抑制剂的混合效应模型。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;12(11):1640-1652. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13026. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
8
Replication of the natural selection of bad science.不良科学自然选择的复制。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 22;10(2):221306. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221306. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
A modern automated patch-clamp approach for high throughput electrophysiology recordings in native cardiomyocytes.一种用于原代心肌细胞高通量电生理学记录的现代自动化膜片钳方法。
Commun Biol. 2022 Sep 15;5(1):969. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03871-2.
10
A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.2014 年至 2018 年泌尿科出版物中可重复和透明研究实践的回顾。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01059-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Sloppy reporting on animal studies proves hard to change.事实证明,关于动物研究的草率报告很难改变。
Science. 2017 Sep 29;357(6358):1337-1338. doi: 10.1126/science.357.6358.1337. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Cash incentives for papers go global.论文现金奖励在全球范围内盛行。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):541. doi: 10.1126/science.357.6351.541.
3
Calcium and Excitation-Contraction Coupling in the Heart.心脏中的钙与兴奋-收缩偶联
Circ Res. 2017 Jul 7;121(2):181-195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310230.
4
Handing Over.
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 Dec;101:173-174. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.11.009.
5
Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.检测和避免可能的假阳性发现——实用指南。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Nov;92(4):1941-1968. doi: 10.1111/brv.12315. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxer created 'Piltdown man'.新的基因和形态学证据表明,“皮尔当人”是由一个恶作剧者伪造出来的。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 10;3(8):160328. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160328. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions.当前对科学家的激励措施导致研究力度不足且结论错误。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 10;14(11):e2000995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000995. eCollection 2016 Nov.
8
The natural selection of bad science.劣质科学的自然选择。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Sep 21;3(9):160384. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160384. eCollection 2016 Sep.
9
Macchiarini scandal is a valuable lesson for the Karolinska Institute.马基亚里尼丑闻对卡罗琳斯卡学院来说是宝贵的一课。
Nature. 2016 Sep 8;537(7619):137. doi: 10.1038/537137a.
10
A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research.提高神经影像学研究透明度和可重复性实用指南。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 7;14(7):e1002506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002506. eCollection 2016 Jul.

科学的可重复性:造假、影响因子和粗心大意。

Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness.

机构信息

Unit of Cardiac Physiology, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, 3.18 Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester, 46 Grafton ST, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.

出版信息

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018 Jan;114:364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.009
PMID:29079076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6565841/
Abstract

There is great concern that results published in a large fraction of biomedical papers may not be reproducible. This article reviews the evidence for this and considers some of the factors that are responsible and how the problem may be solved. One issue is scientific fraud. This, in turn, may result from pressures put on scientists to succeed including the need to publish in "high impact" journals. I emphasise the importance of judging the quality of the science itself as opposed to using surrogate metrics. The other factors discussed include problems of experimental design and statistical analysis of the work. It is important that these issues are addressed by the scientific community before others impose draconian regulations.

摘要

人们非常担心,很大一部分生物医学论文的结果可能是不可重复的。本文回顾了这方面的证据,并考虑了一些导致这种情况的因素,以及如何解决这个问题。一个问题是科学欺诈。这反过来又可能是由于科学家成功的压力造成的,包括需要在“高影响力”期刊上发表论文。我强调了评判科学本身质量的重要性,而不是使用替代指标。讨论的其他因素包括实验设计和工作的统计分析问题。在其他方面强加严厉的规定之前,科学界解决这些问题是很重要的。