Suppr超能文献

应用体外皮肤渗透测量来确认和完善甲基异噻唑啉酮的定量皮肤致敏风险评估。

Application of in vitro skin penetration measurements to confirm and refine the quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment of methylisothiazolinone.

机构信息

Coty, Berliner Allee 65, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.

The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason Business Center, 8700 Mason Montgomery Rd., Mason, OH 45040, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;91:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Abstract

Use of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals present in consumer products requires an understanding of hazard and product exposure. In the absence of data, consumer exposure is based on relevant habits and practices and assumes 100% skin uptake of the applied dose. To confirm and refine the exposure, a novel design for in vitro skin exposure measurements was conducted with the preservative, methylisothiazolinone (MI), in beauty care (BC) and household care (HHC) products using realistic consumer exposure conditions. A difference between measured exposure levels (MELs) for MI in leave-on versus rinse-off BC products, and lower MELs for MI in HHC rinse-off compared to BC products was demonstrated. For repeated product applications, the measured exposure was lower than estimations based on summation of applied amounts. Compared to rinse-off products, leave-on applications resulted in higher MELs, correlating with the higher incidences of allergic contact dermatitis associated with those product types. Lower MELs for MI in rinse-off products indicate a lower likelihood to induce skin sensitization, also after multiple daily applications. These in vitro skin exposure measurements indicate conservatism of default exposure estimates applied in skin sensitization QRA and might be helpful in future risk assessments.

摘要

在使用定量风险评估 (QRA) 评估消费品中存在的化学物质的皮肤致敏潜力时,需要了解危害和产品暴露情况。在缺乏数据的情况下,消费者暴露基于相关的习惯和做法,并假设应用剂量的 100%被皮肤吸收。为了确认和细化暴露情况,使用具有实际消费者暴露条件的新型设计,对防腐剂甲基异噻唑啉酮 (MI) 在美容护理 (BC) 和家庭护理 (HHC) 产品中的体外皮肤暴露进行了测量。结果表明,MI 在免洗 BC 产品中的经皮暴露水平 (MEL) 与在洗去型 BC 产品中的经皮暴露水平之间存在差异,并且 MI 在 HHC 洗去型产品中的 MEL 低于 BC 产品中的 MEL。对于重复产品应用,测量的暴露量低于基于应用量总和的估计值。与洗去型产品相比,免洗型产品的 MEL 更高,这与这些产品类型相关的过敏性接触性皮炎的发生率更高有关。MI 在洗去型产品中的 MEL 较低表明在多次每日应用后诱导皮肤致敏的可能性较低。这些体外皮肤暴露测量表明,在皮肤致敏 QRA 中应用的默认暴露估计值存在保守性,并且可能有助于未来的风险评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验