National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health Protection, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Safety of Substances and Products, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Feb;112:242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.12.054. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
Contact allergy to preservatives is an important public health problem. Ideally, new substances should be evaluated for the risk on skin sensitisation before market entry, for example by using a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) as developed for fragrances. As a proof-of-concept, this QRA was applied to the preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI), a common cause of contact allergy. MI is used in different consumer products, including personal care products (PCPs) and household cleaning products (HCPs). Aggregate exposure to MI in PCPs and HCPs was therefore assessed with the Probabilistic Aggregated Consumer Exposure Model (PACEM). Two exposure scenarios were evaluated: scenario 1 calculated aggregate exposure on actual MI product concentrations before the restricted use in PCPs and scenario 2 calculated aggregate exposure using the restrictions for MI in PCPs. The QRA for MI showed that in scenarios 1 and 2, the proportion of the population at risk for skin sensitisation is 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively. The restricted use of MI in PCPs does not seem very effective in lowering the risk on skin sensitization. To conclude, it is important to consider aggregate exposure from the most important consumer products into consideration in the risk assessment.
接触性过敏反应是一个重要的公共卫生问题。理想情况下,新物质在进入市场之前应进行皮肤致敏风险评估,例如采用已开发的香水定量风险评估(QRA)。作为概念验证,该 QRA 被应用于防腐剂甲基异噻唑啉酮(MI),这是接触性过敏的常见原因。MI 用于不同的消费品,包括个人护理产品(PCP)和家用清洁产品(HCP)。因此,使用概率性聚合消费者暴露模型(PACEM)评估了 PCP 和 HCP 中 MI 的总暴露量。评估了两种暴露情况:情况 1 计算了 PCP 中 MI 实际产品浓度限制使用前的总暴露量,情况 2 使用 PCP 中 MI 的限制计算了总暴露量。MI 的 QRA 表明,在情况 1 和 2 中,皮肤致敏风险人群的比例分别为 0.7%和 0.5%。PCP 中 MI 的限制使用似乎并没有有效地降低皮肤致敏的风险。总之,在风险评估中,需要考虑最重要的消费品的总暴露量。