Revisiting anatomic macroreentrant tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation using ultrahigh-resolution mapping: Implications for ablation.

BACKGROUND

Anatomic macroreentrant atrial tachycardias (MATs) are conventionally reported to depend on the cavotricuspid isthmus, the mitral isthmus, or the left atrial roof, and are commonly seen following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

To define the precise circuits of anatomic MAT with ultrahigh-resolution mapping.

METHODS

In 57 patients (mean age, 62 years; 10 female) who developed ≥1 anatomic MAT, we analyzed 88 MAT circuits including 16 peritricuspid, 42 perimitral, and 30 roof-dependent circuits, using high-density mapping and entrainment.

RESULTS

Of 16 peritricuspid atrial tachycardias (ATs), 8 (50.0%) showed a circuit not limited to the tricuspid annulus. However, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation terminated the tachycardia in all patients. Similarly, 26 of 42 perimitral ATs (61.9%) showed a circuit not limited to the mitral annulus, and a low-voltage zone <0.1 mV around the mitral annulus was associated with nontypical perimitral ATs (P < .0001). The practical isthmus was not in the mitral isthmus in 13 of these 26 perimitral ATs (50%). Finally, 22 of 30 roof-dependent ATs (73.3%) had a circuit not rotating around both pairs of pulmonary veins. Brief assessment of the activation direction on the posterior wall in relation to that on the septal, anterior, and lateral wall helped deduce the circuit of roof-dependent AT in 27 of 30 (90.0%). Practical isthmus was not in the roof in 8 of 22 (36.4%). Practical isthmuses mapped with the system were significantly shorter than the usual anatomic isthmuses (16.1 ± 8.2 mm vs 33.7 ± 10.4 mm) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-density mapping successfully identified the precise circuits and the practical isthmus of anatomic MATs in patients with prior atrial fibrillation ablation.