Buzzoni Roberto, Carnaghi Carlo, Strosberg Jonathan, Fazio Nicola, Singh Simron, Herbst Fabian, Ridolfi Antonia, Pavel Marianne E, Wolin Edward M, Valle Juan W, Oh Do-Youn, Yao James C, Pommier Rodney
IRCCS Foundation, National Institute of Tumors, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Oct 16;10:5013-5030. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S142087. eCollection 2017.
Recently, everolimus was shown to improve median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 months in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of lung or gastrointestinal (GI) tract compared with placebo (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.67; <0.00001) in the Phase III, RADIANT-4 study. This post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of prior therapies (somatostatin analogs [SSA], chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) on everolimus activity.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01524783.
Patients were randomized (2:1) to everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo, both with best supportive care. Subgroups of patients who received prior SSA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy (including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) were analyzed and reported.
A total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom, 163 (54%) had any prior SSA use (mostly for tumor control), 77 (25%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (21%) were previously exposed to radiotherapy. Patients who received everolimus had longer median PFS compared with placebo, regardless of previous SSA (with SSA: 11.1 vs 4.5 months [HR, 0.56 {95% CI, 0.37-0.85}]; without SSA: 9.5 vs 3.7 months [0.57 {0.36-0.89}]), chemotherapy (with chemotherapy: 9.2 vs 2.1 months [0.35 {0.19-0.64}]; without chemotherapy: 11.2 vs 5.4 months [0.60 {0.42-0.86}]), or radiotherapy (with radiotherapy: 9.2 vs 3.0 months [0.47 {0.24-0.94}]; without radiotherapy: 11 vs 5.1 months [0.59 {0.42-0.83}]) exposure. The most frequent drug-related adverse events included stomatitis (59%-65%), fatigue (27%-35%), and diarrhea (24%-34%) among the subgroups.
These results suggest that everolimus improves PFS in patients with advanced, progressive lung or GI NET, regardless of prior therapies. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus in NET.
近期,在III期RADIANT - 4研究中,与安慰剂相比,依维莫司使晚期、进展性、高分化、无功能的肺或胃肠道神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)延长了7.1个月(风险比[HR],0.48;95%置信区间[CI],0.35 - 0.67;P < 0.00001)。这项事后分析评估了既往治疗(生长抑素类似物[SSA]、化疗和放疗)对依维莫司活性的影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01524783。
患者按2:1随机分组,分别接受每日10 mg依维莫司或安慰剂治疗,两者均给予最佳支持治疗。对接受过既往SSA、化疗或放疗(包括肽受体放射性核素治疗)的患者亚组进行了分析和报告。
共纳入302例患者,其中163例(54%)曾使用过任何SSA(主要用于控制肿瘤),77例(25%)接受过化疗,63例(21%)曾接受过放疗。无论既往是否使用过SSA(使用SSA:11.1个月对4.5个月[HR,0.56{95%CI,0.37 - 0.85}];未使用SSA:9.5个月对3.7个月[0.57{0.36 - 0.89}])、化疗(接受化疗:9.2个月对2.1个月[0.35{0.19 - 0.64}];未接受化疗:11.2个月对5.4个月[0.60{0.42 - 0.86}])或放疗(接受放疗:9.2个月对3.0个月[0.47{0.24 - 0.94}];未接受放疗:11个月对5.1个月[0.59{0.42 - 0.83}]),接受依维莫司治疗的患者中位PFS均长于接受安慰剂治疗的患者。各亚组中最常见的药物相关不良事件包括口腔炎(59% - 65%)、疲劳(27% - 35%)和腹泻(24% - 34%)。
这些结果表明,无论既往治疗情况如何,依维莫司均可改善晚期、进展性肺或胃肠道NET患者的PFS。安全性结果与依维莫司在NET中的已知安全性特征一致。