Simon Patricia, Camenga Deepa R, Kong Grace, Connell Christian M, Morean Meghan E, Cavallo Dana A, Krishnan-Sarin Suchitra
Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & The Consultation Center, New Haven, CT.
Yale School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):115-127. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.1.12. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
We examined the associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and adolescent polytobacco use profiles (including e-cigarettes and blunts).
Adolescents (N = 1932) completed surveys conducted in 2014 in 3 Connecticut high schools. Within a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) framework, logistic regressions examined associations between SES and polytobacco use profiles comprising never, ever, and current e-cigarette, blunt, cigarette, cigar, cigarillo, hookah, and smokeless tobacco use.
We identified 5 classes: (1) current polytobacco users; (2) ever polytobacco users; (3) current e-cigarette, blunt, and cigarette users; (4) ever e-cigarette and blunt users; and (5) never users. Low SES, relative to high SES, was associated with greater likelihood of being: (1) an ever polytobacco user; (2) a current e-cigarette, blunt, and cigarette user; and (3) an ever e-cigarette and blunt user, relative to a never user.
Low SES is associated with membership in distinct polytobacco use latent classes. Regulatory initiatives that focus exclusively on cigarette use may miss the opportunity to influence adolescent use of other products, which may be especially relevant to low-income individuals. Future research should examine whether targeting a broader range of products reduces SES-related tobacco use disparities.
我们研究了社会经济地位(SES)与青少年多种烟草使用模式(包括电子烟和大麻烟)之间的关联。
2014年,1932名青少年在康涅狄格州的3所高中完成了调查。在潜在类别分析(LCA)框架内,逻辑回归分析了SES与多种烟草使用模式之间的关联,这些模式包括从不使用、曾经使用和当前使用电子烟、大麻烟、香烟、雪茄、小雪茄、水烟和无烟烟草。
我们确定了5个类别:(1)当前多种烟草使用者;(2)曾经的多种烟草使用者;(3)当前的电子烟、大麻烟和香烟使用者;(4)曾经的电子烟和大麻烟使用者;(5)从不使用者。与高SES相比,低SES与以下情况的可能性更大相关:(1)曾经是多种烟草使用者;(2)当前是电子烟、大麻烟和香烟使用者;(3)曾经是电子烟和大麻烟使用者,相对于从不使用者而言。
低SES与不同的多种烟草使用潜在类别相关。仅关注香烟使用的监管举措可能会错过影响青少年使用其他产品的机会,这可能对低收入个体尤为重要。未来的研究应考察针对更广泛的产品是否能减少与SES相关的烟草使用差异。