Keklik Muzaffer, Keklik Ertugrul, Kalan Ugur, Ozer Ozerhan, Arik Ferhat, Sarikoc Murat
Department of Hematology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ther Apher Dial. 2018 Feb;22(1):87-90. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12607. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
The use of apheresis equipment to collect platelets has rapidly increased in recent years. We compared two apheresis instruments (Haemonetics MCS + and Trima Accel) with regard to platelet (PLT) yield and efficiency, and collection rate (CR) in a retrospective study. Overall 120 data obtained by Haemonetics and Trima systems (N = 60 for each) were randomly selected among 400 plateletpheresis procedures performed at the Apheresis Unit of Kayseri Education and Research Hospital between July 2016 and January 2017. The CR was significantly higher with the Haemonetics compared to the Trima (0.076 ± 0.016 vs. 0.065 ± 0.015 (PLT × 10 /min) respectively; P < 0.001). The PLT yield/unit was higher with the Haemonetics (4.4 ± 0.8 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8 × 10 , P = 0.001). Haemonetics and Trima Accel instruments collected platelets efficiently. We hope that these data will be a guide in selecting equipment for apheresis units.
近年来,使用血液成分单采设备采集血小板的情况迅速增加。在一项回顾性研究中,我们比较了两种血液成分单采仪器(Haemonetics MCS + 和Trima Accel)在血小板(PLT)产量、效率及采集率(CR)方面的差异。在开塞利教育与研究医院血液成分单采科于2016年7月至2017年1月期间进行的400例血小板单采程序中,随机选取了通过Haemonetics和Trima系统获得的120个数据(每种系统各60个)。与Trima相比,Haemonetics的CR显著更高(分别为0.076±0.016与0.065±0.015(PLT×10 /分钟);P<0.001)。Haemonetics的PLT产量/单位更高(4.4±0.8与3.9±0.8×10 ,P = 0.001)。Haemonetics和Trima Accel仪器采集血小板的效率都很高。我们希望这些数据能为血液成分单采科选择设备提供指导。