Hojilla J Carlo, Mehrotra Megha, Truong Hong-Ha M, Glidden David V, Amico K Rivet, McMahan Vanessa, Vlahov David, Chariyalertsak Suwat, Guanira Juan Vicente, Grant Robert M
a School of Nursing , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.
AIDS Care. 2018 Apr;30(4):466-472. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1394437. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
HIV pre-exposure prophyalxis (PrEP) might lead individuals to view serodisclosure as unnecessary. We examined the prevalence of non-disclosure and lack of knowledge of partner status in a global cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) enrolled in the iPrEx Open Label Extension (OLE). We calculated prevalence ratios by fitting a logistic model and estimating predicted probabilities using marginal standardization. Prevalence of non-disclosure and lack of knowledge of partner status were highest in Thailand (73% and 74%, respectively) and lowest in the USA (23% and 37%, respectively). In adjusted analyses, PrEP use was not significantly associated with non-disclosure or lack of knowledge of partner status (p-values>0.05). We found that relationship characteristics were significantly associated with both outcomes. Non-disclosure was higher among casual (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.54, [95% confidence interval 1.24-1.84]) and transactional sex partners (aPR 2.03, [1.44-2.62]), and among partners whom participants have known only minutes or hours before their first sexual encounter (aPR 1.62, [1.33-1.92]). Similarly, participants were less likely to know the HIV status of casual partners (aPR 1.50, [1.30-1.71]), transactional sex partners (aPR 1.62, [1.30-1.95]), and those they have known for only days or weeks (aPR 1.13, [0.99-1.27]) or minutes or hours (aPR 1.27, [1.11-1.42]). Our findings underscore the role of dyadic factors in influencing serodisclosure. Comprehensive risk reduction counseling provided in conjunction with PrEP that address relationship characteristics are needed to help patients navigate discussions around HIV status.
艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)可能会使个体认为血清学信息披露没有必要。我们在参与iPrEx开放标签扩展(OLE)研究的全球男男性行为者(MSM)和跨性别女性(TW)队列中,调查了不披露血清学信息以及对性伴侣状况缺乏了解的情况。我们通过拟合逻辑模型并使用边际标准化估计预测概率来计算患病率比值。不披露血清学信息以及对性伴侣状况缺乏了解的患病率在泰国最高(分别为73%和74%),在美国最低(分别为23%和37%)。在调整分析中,PrEP的使用与不披露血清学信息或对性伴侣状况缺乏了解没有显著关联(p值>0.05)。我们发现关系特征与这两个结果均显著相关。在临时性伴侣(调整患病率比值[aPR]为1.54,[95%置信区间1.24 - 1.84])和交易性性伴侣(aPR为2.03,[1.44 - 2.62])中,以及在参与者首次性接触前仅认识几分钟或几小时的伴侣中(aPR为1.62,[1.33 - 1.92]),不披露血清学信息的情况更为常见。同样,参与者不太可能了解临时性伴侣(aPR为1.50,[1.30 - 1.71])、交易性性伴侣(aPR为1.62,[1.30 - 1.95])以及那些他们仅认识几天或几周(aPR为1.13,[0.99 - 1.27])或几分钟或几小时(aPR为1.27,[1.11 - 1.42])的伴侣的艾滋病毒感染状况。我们的研究结果强调了二元因素在影响血清学信息披露方面的作用。需要结合PrEP提供全面的风险降低咨询,以解决关系特征问题,帮助患者进行有关艾滋病毒感染状况的讨论。