Hersom Maria, Jørgensen Jan T
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dx-Rx Institute, Fredensborg, Denmark.
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Feb;40(1):9-16. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000460.
Over the last couple of decades, molecular diagnostics have played an increasing role in drug development. Especially within oncology, more and more drugs are being developed together with a predictive biomarker assay using the drug-diagnostic codevelopment model. Not only do these assays support the development process but also the use of the drugs after regulatory approval as an important treatment decision tool. When these predictive biomarker assays are linked to a specific drug, they are called companion diagnostics. Furthermore, these assays are also considered an important element in the realization of precision medicine. Today, 21 different drugs have obtained US FDA approval together with a companion diagnostic assay, and the requirement for testing is part of their regulatory labeling. More than half of these drugs are for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the approval of the different programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors, for the treatment of advanced stage NSCLC, a new class of predictive biomarker assays-complementary diagnostics-has emerged. Until now, 3 immune checkpoint inhibitors have obtained regulatory approval for treatment of NSCLC, and they all have a biomarker assay linked to their use. However, only for pembrolizumab, the PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) 22C3 pharmDx assay has status as a companion diagnostic. For nivolumab and atezolizumab, the assays PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) have status as complementary diagnostics, which means that there are no requirements for testing included in the labeling for these drugs. Here, the authors discuss the clinical performance of the different IHC PD-L1 expression assays including the selection of the clinical cutoff values.
在过去几十年里,分子诊断在药物研发中发挥着越来越重要的作用。尤其是在肿瘤学领域,越来越多的药物是采用药物-诊断联合开发模式与预测性生物标志物检测一起研发的。这些检测不仅支持研发过程,而且在监管批准后作为重要的治疗决策工具用于药物的使用。当这些预测性生物标志物检测与特定药物相关联时,它们被称为伴随诊断。此外,这些检测也被视为精准医学实现过程中的一个重要元素。如今,已有21种不同药物连同伴随诊断检测获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准,检测要求是其监管标签的一部分。其中一半以上的药物用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。随着不同的程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)免疫检查点抑制剂获批用于治疗晚期NSCLC,一类新的预测性生物标志物检测——补充诊断——应运而生。到目前为止,已有3种免疫检查点抑制剂获批用于治疗NSCLC,并且它们都有与其使用相关的生物标志物检测。然而,只有帕博利珠单抗的PD-L1免疫组化(IHC)22C3药物诊断检测具有伴随诊断的地位。对于纳武利尤单抗和阿特珠单抗,PD-L1 IHC 22C3药物诊断检测和Ventana PD-L1(SP142)检测具有补充诊断的地位,这意味着这些药物的标签中没有检测要求。在此,作者讨论了不同的IHC PD-L1表达检测的临床性能,包括临床临界值的选择。