Merchant Roland C, Romanoff Justin, Zhang Zihao, Liu Tao, Baird Janette R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Center for Statistical Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Alcohol. 2017 Dec;65:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
Most previous brief intervention (BI) studies have focused on alcohol or drug use, instead of both substances. Our primary aim was to determine if an alcohol- and drug-use BI reduced alcohol use and increased alcohol treatment services utilization among adult emergency department (ED) patients who drink alcohol and require an intervention for their drug use. Our secondary aims were to assess when the greatest relative reductions in alcohol use occurred, and which patients (stratified by need for an alcohol use intervention) reduced their alcohol use the most. In this secondary analysis, we studied a sub-sample of participants from the Brief Intervention for Drug Misuse in the Emergency Department (BIDMED) randomized, controlled trial of a BI vs. no BI, whose responses to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) indicated a need for a BI for any drug use, and who also reported alcohol use. Participants were stratified by their ASSIST alcohol subscore: 1) no BI needed, 2) a BI needed, or 3) an intensive intervention needed for alcohol use. Alcohol use and alcohol treatment services utilization were measured every 3 months for 12 months post-enrollment. Of these 833 participants, median age was 29 years-old, 46% were female; 55% were white/non-Hispanic, 27% black/non-Hispanic, and 15% Hispanic. Although any alcohol use, alcohol use frequency, days of alcohol use, typical drinks consumed/day, and most drinks consumed/day decreased in both the BI and no BI arms, there were no differences between study arms. Few patients sought alcohol use treatment services in follow-up, and utilization also did not differ by study arm. Compared to baseline, alcohol use reduced the most during the first 3 months after enrollment, yet reduced little afterward. Participants whose ASSIST alcohol subscores indicated a need for an intensive intervention generally had the greatest relative decreases in alcohol use. These results indicate that the BI was not efficacious in reducing alcohol use among alcohol- and drug-using adult ED patients than the self-assessments alone, but suggest that self-assessments with or without a BI may confer reductions in alcohol use.
以往大多数简短干预(BI)研究都聚焦于酒精或药物使用,而非两者兼顾。我们的主要目的是确定针对酒精和药物使用的简短干预能否减少饮酒量,并提高成年急诊科(ED)患者中饮酒且需要针对其药物使用进行干预者的酒精治疗服务利用率。我们的次要目的是评估饮酒量何时出现最大程度的相对减少,以及哪些患者(按酒精使用干预需求分层)饮酒量减少最多。在这项二次分析中,我们研究了来自急诊科药物滥用简短干预(BIDMED)随机对照试验的参与者子样本,该试验对比了简短干预与无干预,其对酒精、吸烟和物质使用筛查测试(ASSIST)的回答表明因任何药物使用都需要简短干预,且他们也报告有饮酒行为。参与者按其ASSIST酒精子评分分层:1)无需简短干预,2)需要简短干预,或3)酒精使用需要强化干预。入组后12个月内每3个月测量一次饮酒量和酒精治疗服务利用率。在这833名参与者中,年龄中位数为29岁,46%为女性;55%为白人/非西班牙裔,27%为黑人/非西班牙裔,15%为西班牙裔。尽管简短干预组和无简短干预组的任何饮酒行为、饮酒频率、饮酒天数、每日典型饮酒量和每日最多饮酒量均有所下降,但两组之间无差异。很少有患者在随访中寻求酒精使用治疗服务,且服务利用率在两组间也无差异。与基线相比,饮酒量在入组后的前3个月减少最多,但之后减少很少。ASSIST酒精子评分表明需要强化干预的参与者饮酒量通常相对减少幅度最大。这些结果表明简短干预在减少饮酒和药物使用的成年急诊科患者的饮酒量方面并不比单纯的自我评估更有效,但表明无论有无简短干预,自我评估都可能使饮酒量减少。