Michigan Medicine, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
The primary aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of two motivational interviewing-based alcohol brief interventions (BIs) among adults presenting to an emergency department (ED). The secondary aim was to evaluate moderators of intervention effects.
Participants were 750 ED patients reporting recent alcohol misuse. Participants were randomly assigned to: 1) computer-delivered BI (Computer BI), 2) therapist-delivered BI with computer guidance (Therapist BI-CG), or 3) control. The BIs focused on reduction of alcohol use and risk behaviors. The outcome measure was trajectories of alcohol consumption (measured by the AUDIT-C) across baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments, analyzed using latent growth curve modeling. Moderation of intervention effect by gender, age, and baseline alcohol use disorder severity was examined.
Across the full sample (40% males, mean age = 35.8, SD = 12.3), there was an overall reduction in alcohol consumption across 12 months. The main effects of the Therapist and Computer BI were not significant relative to control. Moderation analysis revealed that the impact of Therapist BI-CG, relative to control, was greater on reductions in alcohol consumption in participants with moderate to severe symptoms of alcohol use disorder compared to those with mild symptoms. The effect of the Computer BI on alcohol use, relative to control, was greater among younger participants compared to older participants.
While no overall effect was shown, ED-based Therapist BI-CG with computer guidance may be effective among patients with moderate-severe drinking patterns, whereas Computer BIs may be more effective for younger participants.
本研究的主要目的是检验两种基于动机访谈的酒精简短干预(BI)在急诊科就诊的成年人中的疗效。次要目的是评估干预效果的调节因素。
研究对象为 750 名报告近期酒精滥用的急诊科患者。参与者被随机分配到以下三组之一:1)计算机提供的 BI(计算机 BI),2)有计算机指导的治疗师提供的 BI(治疗师 BI-CG),或 3)对照组。BI 侧重于减少饮酒和风险行为。结局指标是基线、3、6 和 12 个月随访评估中酒精消耗的轨迹(通过 AUDIT-C 测量),使用潜在增长曲线模型进行分析。检验了性别、年龄和基线酒精使用障碍严重程度对干预效果的调节作用。
在整个样本(40%为男性,平均年龄为 35.8,标准差为 12.3)中,12 个月内酒精消耗总体呈下降趋势。与对照组相比,治疗师 BI 和计算机 BI 的主要效果不显著。调节分析显示,与对照组相比,在中重度酒精使用障碍症状患者中,治疗师 BI-CG 的效果相对更好,而在轻度症状患者中则不然。与对照组相比,计算机 BI 对酒精使用的影响在年轻参与者中更大,而在老年参与者中则不然。
虽然没有显示出总体效果,但基于急诊科的治疗师 BI-CG 结合计算机指导可能对中重度饮酒模式的患者有效,而计算机 BI 可能对年轻参与者更有效。