Suppr超能文献

利用更少的唾液生物标志物进行更准确的口腔癌筛查。

More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.

作者信息

Menke James Michael, Ahsan Md Shahidul, Khoo Suan Phaik

机构信息

A.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.

Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Biomark Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;9:1179299X17732007. doi: 10.1177/1179299X17732007. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Signal detection and Bayesian inferential tools were applied to salivary biomarkers to improve screening accuracy and efficiency in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Potential cancer biomarkers are identified by significant differences in assay concentrations, receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity. However, the end goal is to report to individual patients their risk of having disease given positive or negative test results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and Bayes factors (BFs) estimate evidential support and compile biomarker information to optimize screening accuracy. In total, 26 of 77 biomarkers were mentioned as having been tested at least twice in 137 studies and published in 16 summary papers through 2014. Studies represented 10 212 OSCC and 25 645 healthy patients. The measure of biomarker and panel information value was number of biomarkers needed to approximate 100% positive predictive value (PPV). As few as 5 biomarkers could achieve nearly 100% PPV for a disease prevalence of 0.2% when biomarkers were ordered from highest to lowest LR. When sequentially interpreting biomarker tests, high specificity was more important than test sensitivity in achieving rapid convergence toward a high PPV. Biomarkers ranked from highest to lowest LR were more informative and easier to interpret than AUC or Youden index. The proposed method should be applied to more recently published biomarker data to test its screening value.

摘要

信号检测和贝叶斯推理工具被应用于唾液生物标志物,以提高口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)检测的筛查准确性和效率。通过检测浓度、曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度和特异性的显著差异来识别潜在的癌症生物标志物。然而,最终目标是根据检测结果为个体患者报告其患病风险。似然比(LR)和贝叶斯因子(BF)估计证据支持,并整合生物标志物信息以优化筛查准确性。截至2014年,在137项研究中,77种生物标志物中有26种被提及至少测试过两次,并发表在16篇综述论文中。这些研究涵盖了10212例OSCC患者和25645例健康患者。生物标志物和检测组合信息价值的衡量标准是接近100%阳性预测值(PPV)所需的生物标志物数量。当按照LR从高到低对生物标志物进行排序时,对于患病率为0.2%的疾病,仅5种生物标志物就可实现近100%的PPV。在对生物标志物检测结果进行顺序解读时,高特异性在快速趋向高PPV方面比检测灵敏度更为重要。与AUC或尤登指数相比,按照LR从高到低排序的生物标志物信息更丰富,也更易于解读。应将所提出的方法应用于最新发表的生物标志物数据,以测试其筛查价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f2/5648090/8c4a5834b78a/10.1177_1179299X17732007-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验