Salehi Forod, Riasi Hamid Reza, Ebrahimzadeh Ali, Askari Janatabadi Sima
Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Glob Pediatr Health. 2017 Oct 16;4:2333794X17735972. doi: 10.1177/2333794X17735972. eCollection 2017.
This study aimed to compare the effects of oral midazolam and chloral hydrate in pre-echocardiography sedation of children. In this double-blind clinical trial, 68 children were randomly assigned to midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) or chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg). The intensity, duration, and onset of the drugs' effects were assessed. Data were analyzed using the χ and Mann-Whitney tests ( ≤ .05). The average onset and duration of sedation in the children assigned to midazolam was shorter than in those assigned chloral hydrate (6.35 ± 3.65 and 19.14 ± 5.86 minutes, = .0001, and 27.64 ± 8.34 and 48.97 ± 14.81 minutes, = .0001). Gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the chloral hydrate group (23.5% against 0%, = .003). According to the results of the present study, chloral hydrate and midazolam can be appropriate choices for pre-echocardiography sedation of patients without cardiovascular risk factors. Considering the similar effectiveness, more rapid onset, and shorter duration of sedation, besides less side effects in the midazolam group, researchers recommend the routine use of this drug.
本研究旨在比较口服咪达唑仑和水合氯醛在儿童超声心动图检查前镇静中的效果。在这项双盲临床试验中,68名儿童被随机分配至咪达唑仑组(0.2mg/kg)或水合氯醛组(50mg/kg)。评估了药物作用的强度、持续时间和起效时间。使用χ²检验和曼-惠特尼检验分析数据(P≤0.05)。分配至咪达唑仑组的儿童镇静的平均起效时间和持续时间短于分配至水合氯醛组的儿童(分别为6.35±3.65分钟和19.14±5.86分钟,P = 0.0001;以及27.64±8.34分钟和48.97±14.81分钟,P = 0.0001)。水合氯醛组的胃肠道副作用更常见(23.5% 对比0%,P = 0.003)。根据本研究结果,对于无心血管危险因素的患者,水合氯醛和咪达唑仑可为超声心动图检查前镇静的合适选择。考虑到效果相似、起效更快、镇静持续时间更短,以及咪达唑仑组副作用更少,研究人员建议常规使用该药物。