Suppr超能文献

髓鞘特异性基因表达的调控:与遗传性运动感觉神经病1型的相关性

Regulation of Myelin-Specific Gene Expression: Relevance to CMT1.

作者信息

Kamholz John, Awatramani Raj, Menichella Daniela, Jiang Huiyuan, Xu Wenbo, Shy Michael

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USAGraduate Program in Molecular Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USAInstitute of Neurology, University of Milan, IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore, Policlinico, Milan, ItalyCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Oct;883(1):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08572.x.

Abstract

Schwann cells, the myelinating cells of the peripheral nervous system, are derived from the neural crest. Once neural crest cells are committed to the Schwann cell fate, they can take on one of two phenotypes to become myelinating or nonmyelinating Schwann cells, a decision that is determined by interactions with axons. The critical step in the differentiation of myelinating Schwann cells is the establishment of a one-to-one relationship with axons, the so-called "promyelinating" stage of Schwann cell development. The transition from the promyelinating to the myelinating stage of development is then accompanied by a number of significant changes in the pattern of gene expression, including the activation of a set of genes encoding myelin structural proteins and lipid biosynthetic enzymes, and the inactivation of a set of genes expressed only in immature or nonmyelinating Schwann cells. These changes are regulated mainly at the transcriptional level and also require continuous interaction between Schwann cells and their axons. Two transcription factors, Krox 20 (EGR2) and Oct 6 (SCIP/Tst1), are necessary for the transition from the promyelinating to the myelinating stage of Schwann cell development. Krox 20, expressed in myelinating but not promyelinating Schwann cells, is absolutely required for this transition, and myelination cannot occur in its absence. Oct 6, expressed mainly in promyelinating Schwann cells and then downregulated before myelination, is necessary for the correct timing of this transition, since myelination is delayed in its absence. Neither Krox 20 nor Oct 6, however, is required for the initial activation of myelin gene expression. Although the mechanisms of Krox 20 and Oct 6 action during myelination are not known, mutation in Krox 20 has been shown to cause CMT1, further implicating this protein in the pathogenesis of this disease. Identifying the molecular mechanisms of Krox 20 and Oct 6 action will thus be important both for understanding myelination and for designing future treatments for CMT1. Point mutations in the genes encoding the myelin proteins PMP22 and P0 cause CMT1A without a gene duplication and CMT1B, respectively. Although the clinical and pathological phenotypes of CMT1A and CMT1B are similar, their molecular pathogenesis is quite different. Point mutations in PMP22 alter the trafficking of the protein, so that it accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and intermediate compartment (IC). Mutant PMP22 also sequesters its normal counterpart in the ER, further reducing the amount of PMP22 available for myelin synthesis at the membrane, and accounting, at least in part, for its severe effect on myelination. Mutant PMP22 probably also activates an ER-to-nucleus signal transduction pathway associated with misfolded proteins, which may account for the decrease of myelin gene expression in Schwann cells in Trembler mutant mice. In contrast, absence of expression of the homotypic adhesion molecule, P, in mice in which the gene has been inactivated, produces a unique pattern of Schwann cell gene expression, demonstrating that P plays a regulatory as well as a structural role in myelination. Whether this role is direct, through a P-mediated adhesion pathway, or indirect, through adhesion pathways mediated by cadherins or integrins, however, remains to be determined. The molecular mechanisms underlying dysmyelination in CMT1 are thus complex, with pleitropic effects on Schwann cell physiology that are determined both by the type of mutation and the protein mutated. Identifying these molecular mechanisms, however, are important both for understanding myelination and for designing future treatments for CMT1. Although demyelination is the hallmark of CMT1, the clinical signs and symptoms of this disease are probably produced by axonal degeneration, not demyelination. Interestingly, a number of recent studies have demonstrated that Schwann cells from Trembler mice or patients with CMT1A can induce local axonal abnormalities, including decreased axonal transport, and altered neurofilament phosphorylation. These data thus suggest that disability of patients with CMT1 is caused by abnormal Schwann cell-axonal interactions. Efforts both to understand the effects of myelinating Schwann cells on their axons and to prevent axonal degeneration or promote axonal regeneration are thus central for the future development of a rational molecular therapy for CMT1.

摘要

施万细胞是周围神经系统的髓鞘形成细胞,起源于神经嵴。一旦神经嵴细胞确定为施万细胞命运,它们可以呈现两种表型之一,成为髓鞘形成性或非髓鞘形成性施万细胞,这一决定由与轴突的相互作用决定。髓鞘形成性施万细胞分化的关键步骤是与轴突建立一对一的关系,即施万细胞发育的所谓“前髓鞘形成”阶段。从发育的前髓鞘形成阶段到髓鞘形成阶段的转变伴随着基因表达模式的一些显著变化,包括一组编码髓鞘结构蛋白和脂质生物合成酶的基因的激活,以及一组仅在未成熟或非髓鞘形成性施万细胞中表达的基因的失活。这些变化主要在转录水平上受到调节,并且还需要施万细胞与其轴突之间的持续相互作用。两种转录因子,Krox 20(EGR2)和Oct 6(SCIP/Tst1),对于施万细胞从发育的前髓鞘形成阶段到髓鞘形成阶段的转变是必需的。Krox 20在髓鞘形成性而非前髓鞘形成性施万细胞中表达,是这种转变绝对必需的,没有它则无法发生髓鞘形成。Oct 6主要在前髓鞘形成性施万细胞中表达,然后在髓鞘形成前下调,对于这种转变的正确时机是必需的,因为没有它髓鞘形成会延迟。然而,Krox 20和Oct 6都不是髓鞘基因表达初始激活所必需的。尽管Krox 20和Oct 6在髓鞘形成过程中的作用机制尚不清楚,但已表明Krox 20中的突变会导致CMT1,这进一步表明该蛋白与这种疾病的发病机制有关。因此,确定Krox 20和Oct 6的作用分子机制对于理解髓鞘形成和设计未来CMT1的治疗方法都将很重要。编码髓鞘蛋白PMP22和P0的基因中的点突变分别导致无基因重复的CMT1A和CMT1B。尽管CMT1A和CMT1B的临床和病理表型相似,但其分子发病机制却大不相同。PMP22中的点突变改变了蛋白质的运输,使其在内质网(ER)和中间区室(IC)中积累。突变的PMP22还在内质网中隔离其正常对应物,进一步减少了可用于膜上髓鞘合成的PMP22的量,并且至少部分地解释了其对髓鞘形成的严重影响。突变的PMP22可能还激活了与错误折叠蛋白相关的内质网到细胞核的信号转导途径,这可能解释了震颤突变小鼠施万细胞中髓鞘基因表达的降低。相比之下,在基因已失活的小鼠中,同型粘附分子P的表达缺失产生了独特的施万细胞基因表达模式,表明P在髓鞘形成中起调节以及结构作用。然而,这种作用是直接通过P介导的粘附途径,还是间接通过钙粘蛋白或整合素介导的粘附途径,仍有待确定。因此,CMT1中脱髓鞘的分子机制很复杂,对施万细胞生理学有多效性影响,这由突变类型和突变蛋白决定。然而,确定这些分子机制对于理解髓鞘形成和设计未来CMT1的治疗方法都很重要。尽管脱髓鞘是CMT1的标志,但这种疾病的临床体征和症状可能是由轴突变性而非脱髓鞘产生的。有趣的是,最近的一些研究表明,来自震颤小鼠或CMT1A患者的施万细胞可以诱导局部轴突异常,包括轴突运输减少和神经丝磷酸化改变。因此,这些数据表明CMT1患者的残疾是由异常的施万细胞 - 轴突相互作用引起的。因此,努力理解髓鞘形成性施万细胞对其轴突的影响以及预防轴突变性或促进轴突再生对于未来合理的CMT1分子治疗的发展至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验