Suppr超能文献

LupusPRO 1.8版的验证:系统性红斑狼疮特定疾病患者报告结局工具的更新

Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Azizoddin D R, Weinberg S, Gandhi N, Arora S, Block J A, Sequeira W, Jolly M

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.

2 Division of Rheumatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lupus. 2018 Apr;27(5):728-737. doi: 10.1177/0961203317739128. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

Objectives LupusPRO has shown good measurement properties as a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For the purpose of clinical trials, the version 1.7 (v1.7) domain of Pain-Vitality was separated into distinct Pain, Vitality and Sleep domains in v1.8, and the psychometric properties examined. Methods A total of 131 consecutive SLE patients were self-administered surveys assessing fatigue (FACIT, SF-36), pain (Pain Inventory, SF-36), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index), emotional health (PHQ-9, SF-36) and quality of life (SF-36, LupusPRO) at routine care visits. Internal consistency reliability (ICR) for each domain was obtained using Cronbach's alpha. The convergent construct validity of LupusPRO domains with corresponding SF-36 domains or tools were tested using Spearman correlation. Varimax rotations were conducted to assess factor structures of the LupusPRO v1.8. Results Mean (SD) age was 40.04 (14.10) years. Scores from the LupusPRO-Sleep domain strongly correlated with insomnia scores, while LupusPRO-Vitality correlated strongly with fatigue (FACIT) and SF-36 vitality. The LupusPRO-Pain domain correlated strongly with pain (SF36 Bodily-Pain, Pain Inventory) scores. Similarly, the LupusPRO domains of Physical and Emotional Health had significant correlations with corresponding SF-36 domains. The ICR for HRQoL and non-HRQoL were 0.96 and 0.81. LupusPRO (domains HRQoL and QoL) scores correlated with disease activity. Principal component analysis included seven factor loadings presenting for the HRQOL subscales (combined Sleep, Vitality, and Pain), and three factors for the NHRQoL (Combined Coping and Social Support). Conclusions LupusPRO v1.8 (including its Sleep, Vitality, and Pain domains) has acceptable reliability and validity. Use of LupusPRO as an outcome measure in clinical trials would facilitate responsiveness assessment.

摘要

目的

LupusPRO作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中一种特定疾病的患者报告结局工具,已显示出良好的测量特性。为了进行临床试验,疼痛-活力领域的1.7版(v1.7)在v1.8版中被分离为不同的疼痛、活力和睡眠领域,并对其心理测量特性进行了检验。方法:共有131例连续的SLE患者在常规护理就诊时自行填写调查问卷,评估疲劳(FACIT、SF-36)、疼痛(疼痛量表、SF-36)、失眠(失眠严重程度指数)、情绪健康(PHQ-9、SF-36)和生活质量(SF-36、LupusPRO)。使用Cronbach's alpha获得每个领域的内部一致性信度(ICR)。使用Spearman相关性检验LupusPRO领域与相应SF-36领域或工具的收敛效度。进行方差最大旋转以评估LupusPRO v1.8的因子结构。结果:平均(标准差)年龄为40.04(14.10)岁。LupusPRO-睡眠领域的得分与失眠得分密切相关,而LupusPRO-活力与疲劳(FACIT)和SF-36活力密切相关。LupusPRO-疼痛领域与疼痛(SF36身体疼痛、疼痛量表)得分密切相关。同样,身体和情绪健康的LupusPRO领域与相应的SF-36领域有显著相关性。HRQoL和非HRQoL的ICR分别为0.96和0.81。LupusPRO(HRQoL和QoL领域)得分与疾病活动相关。主成分分析包括七个代表HRQOL子量表(合并睡眠、活力和疼痛)的因子载荷,以及三个代表NHRQoL(合并应对和社会支持)的因子。结论:LupusPRO v1.8(包括其睡眠、活力和疼痛领域)具有可接受的信度和效度。在临床试验中使用LupusPRO作为结局指标将有助于反应性评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验