Mikita Jeffrey A, Niven Alexander S, Drizin Dean L, Gada Satyen M, Deering Shad
Department of Simulation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889.
Medical Education Department, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Jackson Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98431.
Mil Med. 2017 Nov;182(11):e1987-e1991. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00061.
U.S. Army internists serve in a variety of provider roles during deployment, many of which vary from the traditional responsibilities of a general internist or internal medicine subspecialist. There is significant interest in defining specific clinical and procedural skills in which Army internists may require refresher training after deployment, but information to quantify and clarify these needs is lacking.
An online, anonymous survey was created to assess Army internists' experience and comfort level with specialty-specific problems and procedures before and after deployment. This survey was distributed via the Army Central Simulation Committee to all U.S. Army internists eligible for deployment. The survey was available online from January 11, 2012, to March 9, 2012.
Ninety-seven of all 115 (84%) U.S. Army internists eligible for deployment responded. The reported comfort level with core clinical problems in general internal medicine before and after deployment did not change, with the exception of decreased comfort with the performance of advanced cardiac life support (87% versus 76% comfortable, p = 0.035), evaluation and management of anemia (92% versus 83% comfortable, p = 0.039), and comfort with preoperative risk stratification and mitigation (81% versus 65% comfortable, p = 0.017). Providers' reported comfort level performing core internal medicine procedures decreased, including significant decreases with lumbar puncture (p < 0.001), arterial line placement (p = 0.02), ultrasound-guided central line placement (p = 0.01), ultrasound-guided thoracentesis (p = 0.004), and arthrocentesis (p = 0.01). Despite a reported deceased comfort with certain core clinical problems and procedural skills, only 10 of 68 (13%) respondents reported being offered refresher skills training following deployment.
Although Army internists' comfort with core general internal medicine clinical problems remains largely unaffected by deployment, confidence in core internal medicine procedures suffers because of limited opportunities to practice these skills in the deployed setting. Skills training and assessment in procedures required for individual provider practice should be a primary focus of reintegration after deployment.
美国陆军内科医生在部署期间担任多种医疗服务角色,其中许多角色与普通内科医生或内科专科医生的传统职责不同。人们对确定陆军内科医生在部署后可能需要进修培训的特定临床和操作技能有着浓厚兴趣,但缺乏量化和明确这些需求的信息。
创建了一项在线匿名调查,以评估陆军内科医生在部署前后对特定专科问题和操作的经验及熟练程度。该调查通过陆军中央模拟委员会分发给所有符合部署条件的美国陆军内科医生。调查于2012年1月11日至2012年3月9日在线提供。
115名符合部署条件的美国陆军内科医生中有97名(84%)回复了调查。除了对高级心脏生命支持操作的熟练程度下降(从87%降至76%,p = 0.035)、贫血的评估和管理(从92%降至83%,p = 0.039)以及术前风险分层和缓解的熟练程度(从81%降至65%,p = 0.017)外,报告的部署前后对普通内科核心临床问题的熟练程度没有变化。医生报告的进行核心内科操作的熟练程度下降,包括腰椎穿刺(p < 0.001)、动脉置管(p = 0.02)、超声引导下中心静脉置管(p = 0.01)、超声引导下胸腔穿刺(p = 0.004)和关节穿刺(p = 0.01)的熟练程度显著下降。尽管报告对某些核心临床问题和操作技能的熟练程度有所下降,但68名受访者中只有10名(13%)报告在部署后接受了技能进修培训。
尽管陆军内科医生对普通内科核心临床问题的熟练程度在很大程度上不受部署影响,但由于在部署环境中练习这些技能的机会有限,对核心内科操作的信心受到影响。针对个体医疗服务提供者操作所需程序的技能培训和评估应成为部署后重新融入过程的主要重点。