Dunlap Corina, Hanes Douglas, Elder Charles, Nygaard Carolyn, Zwickey Heather
Helfgott Research Institute c/o National University of Natural Medicine, 2220 SW 1st Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Helfgott Research Institute c/o National University of Natural Medicine, 2220 SW 1st Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
Ayurveda is one of the most ancient and widely practiced forms of medicine today, along with Traditional Chinese Medicine. It consists of determining an individual's constitution or Prakriti and current imbalance(s) through the use of multimodal approaches. Ayurveda practitioners may choose to include either a self-reported or structured interview constitutional questionnaire as part of the Prakriti assessment. Currently, there is no standardized or validated self-reported constitutional questionnaire tool employed by Ayurveda physicians or western Ayurveda educational institutions.
To examine test-retest reliability of three self-administered constitutional questionnaires at a one month interval and internal consistency of items pertaining to a single constitution.
Three constitutional questionnaires were administered online. 19 participants completed three questionnaires at two time points, one month apart. Age range was 21-62 years old with a mean age of 34. Of the 19, 5 were male and 14 female. Vata, Pitta, and Kapha scores obtained from each questionnaire were standardized to give a vector of three relative percentages, summing to 100. These percentages were further translated from numerical values to one of ten possible dosha diagnoses.
Analysis indicated that the three questionnaires had moderately good test-retest reliability according to numerical scores, but highly variable reliability according to discrete Ayurveda diagnosis. Internal consistency pertaining to individual constitutions within one questionnaire was poor for all three primary doshas, but especially for Kapha.
Further research is necessary to develop a reliable and standardized constitutional questionnaire.
阿育吠陀医学是当今最古老且应用广泛的医学形式之一,与传统中医并列。它通过多模式方法来确定个体的体质或生命能量类型以及当前的失衡状况。阿育吠陀医学从业者在生命能量类型评估中可能会选择纳入一份自我报告或结构化访谈的体质问卷。目前,阿育吠陀医生或西方阿育吠陀教育机构并未采用标准化或经过验证的自我报告体质问卷工具。
每隔一个月检查三份自我管理的体质问卷的重测信度以及与单一体质相关项目的内部一致性。
通过在线方式发放三份体质问卷。19名参与者在两个时间点完成了三份问卷,时间间隔为一个月。年龄范围为21至62岁,平均年龄为34岁。19名参与者中,5名男性,14名女性。从每份问卷中获得的风、火、水三种生命能量类型得分被标准化,得出一个由三个相对百分比组成的向量,总和为100。这些百分比进一步从数值转换为十种可能的生命能量类型诊断之一。
分析表明,根据数值分数,这三份问卷具有中等程度的良好重测信度,但根据离散的阿育吠陀诊断,信度差异很大。对于所有三种主要生命能量类型,一份问卷中与个体体质相关的内部一致性较差,尤其是水能量类型。
有必要进行进一步研究以开发一种可靠且标准化的体质问卷。