Suppr超能文献

从印度视角比较清洁择期手术病例中,围手术期关键期短期三剂量抗生素覆盖与传统延长术后抗生素使用的有效性。

To Compare the Effectiveness of Short-term Three Dose Perioperative Antibiotic Coverage during Decisive Period with Conventional Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Usage in Clean Elective Surgical Cases: An Indian Perspective.

作者信息

Khichy Sudhir, Singh Baldev, Singh Manpreet, Singh Sukha

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Niger J Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec;23(2):92-97. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_55_16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections are the most common postoperative complications and frequently cause morbidity and mortality. Different antibiotic regimens were evaluated as prophylaxis in wound infection following elective surgical procedures. Prophylactic antibiotics should be given to cover the "decisive period" which is a period after incision to mobilization of host defenses thus preventing an infection from developing.

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to study the effectiveness of short-term antibiotic coverage during decisive period in the prevention of postoperative wound sepsis in clean surgical cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective randomized comparative study included 50 patients divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A (short-term ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received three doses of 1 g intravenous ceftriaxone. First dose 12 h, 2 dose 1 h before operation and the 3 dose was given 10 h after the operation. The Group B (conventional postoperative ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received postoperatively 1 g B. D intravenous ceftriaxone for 5 days. We compared the incidence of surgical site infection in two groups.

STUDY PERIOD

November 2014 to September 2016. A predesigned and pretested proforma was used to collect the data. Surgical sites were examined for 30 days. Robertson grading was used to assess the severity of infection.

RESULTS

Surgical site infection rate was 4% in Group A and 24% in Group B. The severity of infection was less in short-term prophylaxis group. Anemia, nutritional status, and use of drain were other factors associated with postoperative wound infections.

CONCLUSION

Short course perioperative (three doses) ceftriaxone prophylaxis is sufficient in preventing wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotic should be given to cover the decisive period to prevent an infection from developing. The judicious use of antibiotics can reduce the cost, unnecessary prolonged exposure, side effects, and the emergence of resistant micro-organisms.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染是最常见的术后并发症,常导致发病和死亡。对不同抗生素方案进行了评估,以作为择期手术伤口感染的预防措施。预防性抗生素应在“关键期”给药,即从切口至宿主防御机制启动的这段时间,从而防止感染发生。

目的

研究在清洁手术病例的关键期内短期使用抗生素预防术后伤口脓毒症的有效性。

材料与方法

前瞻性随机对照研究纳入50例患者,分为两组,每组25例。A组(短期头孢曲松预防组)患者接受3剂1g静脉注射头孢曲松。第1剂在术前12小时给药,第2剂在术前1小时给药,第3剂在术后10小时给药。B组(传统术后头孢曲松预防组)患者术后接受1g静脉注射头孢曲松,每日2次,共5天。我们比较了两组手术部位感染的发生率。

研究期间

2014年11月至2016年9月。使用预先设计和预测试的表格收集数据。对手术部位进行30天的检查。采用罗伯逊分级法评估感染的严重程度。

结果

A组手术部位感染率为4%,B组为24%。短期预防组的感染严重程度较轻。贫血、营养状况和引流管的使用是与术后伤口感染相关的其他因素。

结论

围手术期短期(3剂)使用头孢曲松预防足以预防伤口感染。预防性抗生素应在关键期给药以防止感染发生。合理使用抗生素可降低成本、避免不必要的长期暴露、减少副作用以及防止耐药微生物的出现。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines.毛发移植实践指南。
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):265-284. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_104_20.

本文引用的文献

8
Obesity: impediment to postsurgical wound healing.肥胖:术后伤口愈合的阻碍
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004 Oct;17(8):426-35. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200410000-00013.
9
Wound infection.伤口感染
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1958 Sep;23(3):141-54.
10
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in the surgical patient.外科患者的抗菌预防
Med Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;87(1):59-75. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(02)00145-1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验