Xu Dong, Anderson Heather D, Tao Aoxiang, Hannah Katia L, Linnebur Sunny A, Valuck Robert J, Culbertson Vaughn L
Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, 1311 East Central Drive, Meridian, ID 83642, USA.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;8(11):361-370. doi: 10.1177/2042098617725267. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Anticholinergic (AC) adverse drug events (ADEs) are caused by inhibition of muscarinic receptors as a result of designated or off-target drug-receptor interactions. In practice, AC toxicity is assessed primarily based on clinician experience. The goal of this study was to evaluate a novel concept of integrating big pharmacological and healthcare data to assess clinical AC toxicity risks.
AC toxicity scores (ATSs) were computed using drug-receptor inhibitions identified through pharmacological data screening. A longitudinal retrospective cohort study using medical claims data was performed to quantify AC clinical risks. ATS was compared with two previously reported toxicity measures. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model was established for rapid assessment and prediction of AC clinical risks.
A total of 25 common medications, and 575,228 exposed and unexposed patients were analyzed. Our data indicated that ATS is more consistent with the trend of AC outcomes than other toxicity methods. Incorporating drug pharmacokinetic parameters to ATS yielded a QSAR model with excellent correlation to AC incident rate ( = 0.83) and predictive performance (cross validation = 0.64). Good correlation and predictive performance ( = 0.68/ = 0.29) were also obtained for an M2 receptor-specific QSAR model and tachycardia, an M2 receptor-specific ADE.
Albeit using a small medication sample size, our pilot data demonstrated the potential and feasibility of a new computational AC toxicity scoring approach driven by underlying pharmacology and big data analytics. Follow-up work is under way to further develop the ATS scoring approach and clinical toxicity predictive model using a large number of medications and clinical parameters.
抗胆碱能(AC)药物不良事件(ADEs)是由特定或非靶向药物-受体相互作用导致毒蕈碱受体抑制引起的。在实际中,AC毒性主要基于临床医生的经验进行评估。本研究的目的是评估整合大型药理学和医疗保健数据以评估临床AC毒性风险的新概念。
使用通过药理学数据筛选确定的药物-受体抑制作用计算AC毒性评分(ATSs)。利用医疗理赔数据进行纵向回顾性队列研究,以量化AC临床风险。将ATS与之前报道的两种毒性测量方法进行比较。建立定量构效关系(QSAR)模型,用于快速评估和预测AC临床风险。
共分析了25种常用药物以及575,228名暴露和未暴露的患者。我们的数据表明,与其他毒性方法相比,ATS与AC结果的趋势更一致。将药物药代动力学参数纳入ATS产生了一个与AC发生率(= 0.83)和预测性能(交叉验证 = 0.64)具有良好相关性的QSAR模型。对于M2受体特异性QSAR模型和心动过速(一种M2受体特异性ADE),也获得了良好的相关性和预测性能(= 0.68 /= 0.29)。
尽管使用的药物样本量较小,但我们的初步数据证明了一种由基础药理学和大数据分析驱动的新计算AC毒性评分方法的潜力和可行性。后续工作正在进行,以使用大量药物和临床参数进一步开发ATS评分方法和临床毒性预测模型。