Riggs Kevin R, Berger Zackary D, Makary Martin A, Bass Eric B, Chander Geetanjali
Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument Street, Room 8060, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2017 Oct 24;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s13741-017-0072-5. eCollection 2017.
There is substantial variation in the practice of preoperative medical evaluation (PME) and limited evidence for its benefit, which raises concerns about overuse. Surgeons have a unique role in this multidisciplinary practice. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore surgeons' practices and their beliefs about PME.
We conducted of semi-structured interviews with 18 surgeons in Baltimore, Maryland. Surgeons were purposively sampled to maximize diversity in terms of practice type (academic vs. private practice), surgical specialty, gender, and experience level. General topics included surgeons' current PME practices, perceived benefits and harms of PME, the surgical risk assessment, and potential improvements and barriers to change. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis to identify themes, which are presented as assertions. Transcripts were re-analyzed to identify supporting and opposing instances of each assertion.
A total of 15 themes emerged. There was wide variation in surgeons' described PME practices. Surgeons believed that PME improves surgical outcomes, but not all patients benefit. Surgeons were cognizant of the financial cost of the current system and the potential inconvenience that additional tests and office visits pose to patients. Surgeons believed that PME has minimal to no risk and that a normal PME is reassuring to them and patients. Surgeons were confident in their ability to assess surgical risk, and risk assessment by non-surgeons rarely affected their surgical decision-making. Hospital and anesthesiology requirements were a major driver of surgeons' PME practices. Surgeons did not receive much training on PME but perceived their practices to be similar to their colleagues. Surgeons believed that PME provides malpractice protection, welcomed standardization, and perceived there to be inadequate evidence to significantly change their current practice.
Views of surgeons should be considered in future research on and reforms to the PME process.
术前医学评估(PME)的实践存在很大差异,且其益处的证据有限,这引发了对过度使用的担忧。外科医生在这种多学科实践中扮演着独特的角色。这项定性研究的目的是探讨外科医生的实践以及他们对PME的看法。
我们对马里兰州巴尔的摩市的18名外科医生进行了半结构化访谈。为了在实践类型(学术型与私人执业)、外科专科、性别和经验水平方面实现最大程度的多样性,我们有目的地抽取了外科医生。一般主题包括外科医生当前的PME实践、对PME的感知益处和危害、手术风险评估以及潜在的改进和变革障碍。访谈进行了录音和转录。使用内容分析对转录本进行分析以识别主题,这些主题以断言的形式呈现。对转录本进行重新分析以识别每个断言的支持和反对实例。
共出现了15个主题。外科医生描述的PME实践存在很大差异。外科医生认为PME能改善手术结果,但并非所有患者都能从中受益。外科医生意识到当前系统的财务成本以及额外检查和门诊给患者带来的潜在不便。外科医生认为PME的风险极小或没有风险,正常的PME对他们和患者都能起到安抚作用。外科医生对自己评估手术风险的能力很有信心,非外科医生进行的风险评估很少影响他们的手术决策。医院和麻醉科的要求是外科医生PME实践的主要驱动因素。外科医生在PME方面接受的培训不多,但认为自己的实践与同事相似。外科医生认为PME提供了医疗事故保护,欢迎标准化,并且认为没有足够的证据来显著改变他们当前的实践。
在未来关于PME流程的研究和改革中应考虑外科医生的观点。