Riggs Kevin R, Bass Eric B, Segal Jodi B
Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2018 Mar;10:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pcorm.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
To determine the independent association of patient- and surgery-specific risk with receipt of outpatient preoperative testing.
Using administrative data from 2010-2013 (Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters), we constructed a retrospective cohort of 678,368 privately-insured, non-elderly US adults who underwent one of ten operations, including one lower-risk and one higher-risk operation from five surgical specialties. Outcomes were receipt of nine outpatient tests in the 30 days before surgery and cost of those tests. Patient-specific risk was based on Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and, alternatively, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Surgery-specific risk was based on operation (higher- versus lower-risk within each specialty). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to measure the independent association of patient- and surgery-specific risk with the receipt of tests.
Receipt of tests ranged from 0.9% (pulmonary function tests) to 46.8% (blood counts), and 65.2% of patients received at least one test. Mean cost per patient for all tests was $124.38. Higher RCRI was strongly associated (Odds Ratio (OR) >2) with receipt of stress tests and echocardiograms, and more modestly associated [OR <2] with receipt of most other tests. Undergoing higher-risk operations was strongly associated with receipt of most tests. Results were similar using the CCI for patient-specific risk.
Surgery-specific risk is strongly associated with receipt of most preoperative tests, which is consistent with preoperative testing protocols based as much or more on the planned operation as on patient-specific risk factors. Whether this pattern of preoperative testing represents optimal care is uncertain.
确定患者特异性风险和手术特异性风险与术前门诊检查接受情况之间的独立关联。
利用2010 - 2013年的管理数据(Marketscan商业索赔和病历),我们构建了一个回顾性队列,纳入678368名有私人保险的非老年美国成年人,他们接受了十种手术中的一种,其中包括来自五个外科专科的一项低风险手术和一项高风险手术。观察指标为术前30天内接受九种门诊检查的情况以及这些检查的费用。患者特异性风险基于修订心脏风险指数(RCRI),或者采用Charlson合并症指数(CCI)。手术特异性风险基于手术类型(每个专科内的高风险与低风险)。构建多变量逻辑回归模型来衡量患者特异性风险和手术特异性风险与检查接受情况之间的独立关联。
检查接受率从0.9%(肺功能检查)到46.8%(血细胞计数)不等,65.2%的患者接受了至少一项检查。所有检查的人均费用为124.38美元。较高的RCRI与接受应激试验和超声心动图检查密切相关(比值比(OR)>2),与接受大多数其他检查的相关性较弱(OR<2)。接受高风险手术与接受大多数检查密切相关。使用CCI评估患者特异性风险时结果相似。
手术特异性风险与大多数术前检查的接受情况密切相关,这与术前检查方案一致,该方案更多地基于计划进行的手术而非患者特异性风险因素。这种术前检查模式是否代表最佳治疗尚不确定。