Young Charlotte E, Boyle Frances M, Mutch Allyson J
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Comorb. 2016 Oct 26;6(2):103-113. doi: 10.15256/joc.2016.6.79. eCollection 2016.
Care plans have been part of the primary care landscape in Australia for almost two decades. With an increasing number of patients presenting with multiple chronic conditions, it is timely to consider whether care plans meet the needs of patients and clinicians.
To review and benchmark existing care plan templates that include recommendations for comorbid conditions, against four key criteria: (i) patient preferences, (ii) setting priorities, (iii) identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions, and (iv) setting dates for reviewing the care plan.
Document analysis of Australian care plan templates published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care.
Sixteen templates were reviewed. All of the care plan templates addressed patient preference, but this was not done comprehensively. Only three templates included setting priorities. None assisted in identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions. Fifteen templates included setting a date for reviewing the care plan.
Care plans are a well-used tool in primary care practice, but their current format perpetuates a single-disease approach to care, which works contrary to their intended purpose. Restructuring care plans to incorporate shared decision-making and attention to patient preferences may assist in shifting the focus back to the patient and their care needs.
在澳大利亚,护理计划已成为基层医疗领域的一部分近二十年了。随着越来越多的患者患有多种慢性病,现在是时候考虑护理计划是否满足患者和临床医生的需求了。
根据四个关键标准,审查并对比现有的护理计划模板,这些模板包含对合并症的建议:(i)患者偏好,(ii)确定优先级,(iii)识别病症之间的冲突和协同作用,以及(iv)设定护理计划审查日期。
对2006年至2014年发布的澳大利亚护理计划模板进行文献分析,这些模板纳入了基层医疗中管理合并症的建议。
审查了16个模板。所有护理计划模板都涉及患者偏好,但做得并不全面。只有三个模板包括确定优先级。没有一个模板有助于识别病症之间的冲突和协同作用。15个模板包括设定护理计划审查日期。
护理计划是基层医疗实践中常用的工具,但其当前形式延续了单一疾病的护理方法,这与其预期目的背道而驰。重新构建护理计划以纳入共同决策并关注患者偏好,可能有助于将重点重新转移到患者及其护理需求上。