• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国 2 型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素治疗的观察性登记研究:安全性和低血糖预测因素。

Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: Safety and Hypoglycemia Predictors.

机构信息

1 Peking University First Hospital , Beijing, China .

2 Peking University People's Hospital , Beijing, China .

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Nov;19(11):675-684. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0111. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2017.0111
PMID:29090977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) study evaluated the safety of basal insulin (BI) in real-world settings in China.

METHODS

We analyzed 9002 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents from 8 geographic regions and 2 hospital tiers in China who initiated and maintained BI treatment. Body weight and hypoglycemic episodes were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Age, gender, inpatient/outpatient status, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline and at the end of study, T2D duration, microvascular complications, BI type, combination with insulin secretagogues, self-monitoring of blood glucose frequency, and insulin dosage, all predicted hypoglycemia. BI use generally did not induce significant weight gain (0.02 kg); weight gain with insulin detemir (-0.30 kg) was less than that with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (0.20 kg) or insulin glargine (0.05 kg). Overall, general hypoglycemia incidence (5.6% vs. 7.7%) and annual event rate (1.6 vs. 1.8) were similar before and after BI initiation, whereas a slight decrease was noted in severe hypoglycemia incidence (0.6%-0.3%) and frequency (0.05-0.03 events/patient-year). The general hypoglycemia rate was lowest with insulin glargine, whereas there was no significant difference in severe hypoglycemia among the three BI groups. Overall, 3.5% of patients had at least one SAE during the study. Most SAEs were found to be unrelated to BI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world BI use, particularly insulin detemir and glargine, was associated with only slight weight gain and low hypoglycemia risk in patients with T2D in China.

摘要

背景

观察性基础胰岛素治疗注册研究(ORBIT)评估了基础胰岛素(BI)在真实环境下在中国的安全性。

方法

我们分析了来自中国 8 个地理区域和 2 个医院级别的 9002 例口服降糖药控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者,他们开始并维持 BI 治疗。体重和低血糖发作在基线和 3 个月和 6 个月时记录。严重不良事件(SAE)在 3 个月和 6 个月时记录。

结果

年龄、性别、住院/门诊状态、体重指数、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)在基线和研究结束时、T2D 病程、微血管并发症、BI 类型、与胰岛素促分泌剂联合使用、自我监测血糖的频率和胰岛素剂量均预测低血糖。BI 一般不会引起明显的体重增加(0.02kg);与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)胰岛素(0.20kg)或甘精胰岛素(0.05kg)相比,使用胰岛素地特胰岛素(0.30kg)引起的体重增加更少。总体而言,BI 起始前后一般低血糖发生率(5.6%比 7.7%)和年事件发生率(1.6 比 1.8)相似,严重低血糖发生率(0.6%-0.3%)和频率(0.05-0.03 次/患者年)略有下降。甘精胰岛素的一般低血糖发生率最低,而三种 BI 组之间严重低血糖无显著差异。总体而言,研究期间 3.5%的患者至少发生一次 SAE。大多数 SAE 被认为与 BI 治疗无关。

结论

在真实世界中,BI 的使用,特别是地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素,与中国 T2D 患者的体重增加轻微和低血糖风险低有关。

相似文献

1
Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: Safety and Hypoglycemia Predictors.中国 2 型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素治疗的观察性登记研究:安全性和低血糖预测因素。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Nov;19(11):675-684. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0111. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Comparative effectiveness and safety of different basal insulins in a real-world setting.不同基础胰岛素在真实环境中的疗效和安全性比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Aug;19(8):1116-1126. doi: 10.1111/dom.12920. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.基础胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素起始治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊或住院及血糖控制的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):53-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7993.
4
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在2型糖尿病住院患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机交叉试验
Adv Ther. 2016 Feb;33(2):178-85. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0288-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Comparison of Hypoglycemia and Safety Outcomes With Long-Acting Insulins Versus Insulin NPH in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes.长效胰岛素与 NPH 胰岛素治疗孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的低血糖及安全性结局比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;54(7):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1060028019897897. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
6
Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: Real-life use of basal insulin in China.观察性基础胰岛素治疗登记研究(ORBIT):在中国,口服抗高血糖药物控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的基础胰岛素实际应用。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jun;19(6):822-830. doi: 10.1111/dom.12886. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
A 1-year, prospective, observational study of Japanese outpatients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes switching from insulin glargine or detemir to insulin degludec in basal-bolus insulin therapy (Kumamoto Insulin Degludec Observational study).一项针对日本1型和2型糖尿病门诊患者的为期1年的前瞻性观察性研究,这些患者在基础-餐时胰岛素治疗中从甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素转换为德谷胰岛素(熊本德谷胰岛素观察性研究)。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Sep;7(5):703-10. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12496. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
8
Real-World Health Outcomes of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL vs Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in the Canadian LMC Diabetes Patient Registry: The REALITY Study.加拿大 LMC 糖尿病患者登记处的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人中甘精胰岛素 300 U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100 U/mL 的真实世界健康结局:REALITY 研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Oct;43(7):504-509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir in combination with oral antidiabetic agents in an outpatient specialist setting: results of the Italian SOLVE™ observational study.在门诊专科环境中,德谷胰岛素与口服抗糖尿病药物联合使用的安全性和有效性:意大利SOLVE™观察性研究结果
Minerva Endocrinol. 2015 Dec;40(4):249-58.
10
Insulins NPH, glargine, and detemir, and risk of severe hypoglycemia among working-age adults.中效胰岛素、甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与工作年龄成年人严重低血糖风险
Ann Med. 2017 Jun;49(4):357-364. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1278302. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Clinical and Economic Effects of Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide from Other GLP-1 RAs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Modeling Projection Study.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,从其他胰高糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)转换为每周一次司美格鲁肽的长期临床和经济影响:一项模型预测研究
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):904-917. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03082-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Hypoglycemia unawareness identified by continuous glucose monitoring system is frequent in outpatients with type 2 diabetes without receiving intensive therapeutic interventions.通过持续葡萄糖监测系统识别出的低血糖无意识现象在未接受强化治疗干预的2型糖尿病门诊患者中很常见。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Nov 28;14(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00959-x.
3
Efficacy and Safety of a Decision Support Intervention for Basal Insulin Self-Titration Assisted by the Nurse in Outpatients with T2DM: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
护士协助下的基础胰岛素自我滴定决策支持干预对2型糖尿病门诊患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Mar 22;14:1315-1327. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S297913. eCollection 2021.
4
A practical approach to the clinical challenges in initiation of basal insulin therapy in people with type 2 diabetes.在 2 型糖尿病患者中起始基础胰岛素治疗的临床挑战的实用方法。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Sep;37(6):e3418. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3418. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
The differences in homeostasis model assessment values in type 2 diabetic patients with different lengths of history of diabetes.不同糖尿病病程的2型糖尿病患者稳态模型评估值的差异。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May-Jun;63(3):222-227. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000134. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.基础胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素起始治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊或住院及血糖控制的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):53-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7993.