• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效胰岛素与 NPH 胰岛素治疗孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的低血糖及安全性结局比较。

Comparison of Hypoglycemia and Safety Outcomes With Long-Acting Insulins Versus Insulin NPH in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes.

机构信息

University Health Care System, Augusta, GA, USA.

Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;54(7):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1060028019897897. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1177/1060028019897897
PMID:31893932
Abstract

Current guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend insulin as the standard therapy for treatment of pregestational and gestational diabetes (PGDM and GDM). However, the guidelines do not specify which type(s) of insulin to utilize. Additionally, there are limited published data regarding safety parameters of insulin in this population. To evaluate if insulin glargine or detemir (long-acting insulin) results in less hypoglycemia, hospitalizations, or delivery complications compared with intermediate-acting insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in PGDM and GDM. This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included pregnant women who were 18 years or older with PGDM or GDM and received insulin therapy during pregnancy at an outpatient obstetric clinic. The primary outcome was the frequency of hypoglycemia (BG < 60 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and hospitalizations, delivery complications, and the duration of time at glycemic targets during pregnancy. A total of 63 patients were included for evaluation. There was no significant difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia between the long-acting and NPH groups (4.4 vs 6.2 events per patient, respectively; = 0.361). Patients receiving long-acting insulin had significantly more encounters with diabetes education (10.6 vs 5.1 visits per patient, = 0.002) and more consistently provided glucose readings at their appointments (8.3 vs 4.8, = 0.043). There was no difference in hospitalizations or maternal and neonatal complications. Long-acting insulins did not reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia compared with NPH. The results of this study confirm the need for additional investigations with larger populations.

摘要

美国妇产科医师学会的现行指南建议胰岛素为孕前和妊娠期糖尿病(PGDM 和 GDM)的标准治疗方法。然而,指南并未具体规定使用哪种(些)类型的胰岛素。此外,关于该人群中胰岛素的安全性参数,发表的数据有限。

为了评估甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素(长效胰岛素)与中效胰岛素中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)相比,是否会导致 PGDM 和 GDM 患者的低血糖、住院或分娩并发症更少。

这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究,纳入了在妇产科门诊接受胰岛素治疗的年龄在 18 岁及以上的 PGDM 或 GDM 孕妇。主要结局是低血糖(BG < 60mg/dL)的频率。次要结局包括急诊就诊和住院、分娩并发症以及妊娠期间达到血糖目标的时间。

共有 63 例患者接受评估。长效组和 NPH 组的低血糖频率无显著差异(分别为 4.4 次和 6.2 次/患者;=0.361)。接受长效胰岛素的患者接受糖尿病教育的次数明显更多(分别为 10.6 次和 5.1 次/患者;=0.002),并且在预约时更一致地提供血糖读数(分别为 8.3 次和 4.8 次;=0.043)。两组的住院率或母婴并发症无差异。

与 NPH 相比,长效胰岛素并未降低低血糖的发生频率。本研究结果证实需要更大人群的进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Hypoglycemia and Safety Outcomes With Long-Acting Insulins Versus Insulin NPH in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes.长效胰岛素与 NPH 胰岛素治疗孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的低血糖及安全性结局比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;54(7):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1060028019897897. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.基础胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素起始治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊或住院及血糖控制的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):53-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7993.
3
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.超长效胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(人低精蛋白胰岛素)用于2型糖尿病成人患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD005613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005613.pub4.
4
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.(超)长效胰岛素类似物用于 1 型糖尿病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2.
5
Basal Insulin Analogs versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn for Type 2 Diabetics.基础胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的比较
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jan;37(1):30-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694733. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Randomized controlled trial of insulin detemir versus NPH for the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes.胰岛素地特胰岛素与 NPH 治疗妊娠糖尿病的随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):426.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Comparative effectiveness and safety of different basal insulins in a real-world setting.不同基础胰岛素在真实环境中的疗效和安全性比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Aug;19(8):1116-1126. doi: 10.1111/dom.12920. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin glargine with NPH insulin, premixed insulin preparations or with insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes mellitus.对2型糖尿病中甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素、预混胰岛素制剂或地特胰岛素的疗效和安全性结果进行比较的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Aug;52(4):649-62. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0698-4. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Evaluation of the incidence and risk of hypoglycemic coma associated with selection of basal insulin in the treatment of diabetes: a Finnish register linkage study.糖尿病治疗中基础胰岛素选择与低血糖昏迷发生率及风险的评估:一项芬兰登记链接研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1326-35. doi: 10.1002/pds.3534. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Insulins NPH, glargine, and detemir, and risk of severe hypoglycemia among working-age adults.中效胰岛素、甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与工作年龄成年人严重低血糖风险
Ann Med. 2017 Jun;49(4):357-364. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1278302. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Diabetes in Pregnancy: Critical Approaches to Mitigate Risks and Improve Outcomes for Mother and Child.应对妊娠期糖尿病:降低母婴风险并改善结局的关键方法
Metabolites. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):180. doi: 10.3390/metabo15030180.
2
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.妊娠合并 1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗的效果比较。
J Diabetes. 2024 May;16(5):e13558. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13558.
3
Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design.
妊娠期糖尿病和孕前糖尿病患者孕期胰岛素使用情况:研究设计的系统评价
Diabetes Ther. 2024 May;15(5):929-1045. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01541-6. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Comparison of treatment with insulin detemir and NPH in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. A retrospective study.比较胰岛素地特胰岛素和 NPH 在妊娠糖尿病妇女中的治疗效果:血糖控制和妊娠结局。一项回顾性研究。
Hormones (Athens). 2023 Dec;22(4):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s42000-023-00490-2. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Gestational diabetes mellitus: The optimal time of delivery.妊娠期糖尿病:最佳分娩时间
World J Diabetes. 2023 Mar 15;14(3):179-187. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i3.179.
6
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with the use of long acting, compared to intermediate acting basal insulin (NPH) for managing diabetes during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与使用中效基础胰岛素(NPH)相比,使用长效胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的母婴结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Oct 21;14(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00925-7.
7
Effect of Evidence-Based Diet Nursing on Intestinal Flora and Maternal and Infant Prognosis in Patients with Gestational Diabetes.循证饮食护理对妊娠期糖尿病患者肠道菌群及母婴预后的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Sep 1;2022:1241530. doi: 10.1155/2022/1241530. eCollection 2022.