University Health Care System, Augusta, GA, USA.
Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;54(7):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1060028019897897. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Current guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend insulin as the standard therapy for treatment of pregestational and gestational diabetes (PGDM and GDM). However, the guidelines do not specify which type(s) of insulin to utilize. Additionally, there are limited published data regarding safety parameters of insulin in this population. To evaluate if insulin glargine or detemir (long-acting insulin) results in less hypoglycemia, hospitalizations, or delivery complications compared with intermediate-acting insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in PGDM and GDM. This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included pregnant women who were 18 years or older with PGDM or GDM and received insulin therapy during pregnancy at an outpatient obstetric clinic. The primary outcome was the frequency of hypoglycemia (BG < 60 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and hospitalizations, delivery complications, and the duration of time at glycemic targets during pregnancy. A total of 63 patients were included for evaluation. There was no significant difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia between the long-acting and NPH groups (4.4 vs 6.2 events per patient, respectively; = 0.361). Patients receiving long-acting insulin had significantly more encounters with diabetes education (10.6 vs 5.1 visits per patient, = 0.002) and more consistently provided glucose readings at their appointments (8.3 vs 4.8, = 0.043). There was no difference in hospitalizations or maternal and neonatal complications. Long-acting insulins did not reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia compared with NPH. The results of this study confirm the need for additional investigations with larger populations.
美国妇产科医师学会的现行指南建议胰岛素为孕前和妊娠期糖尿病(PGDM 和 GDM)的标准治疗方法。然而,指南并未具体规定使用哪种(些)类型的胰岛素。此外,关于该人群中胰岛素的安全性参数,发表的数据有限。
为了评估甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素(长效胰岛素)与中效胰岛素中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)相比,是否会导致 PGDM 和 GDM 患者的低血糖、住院或分娩并发症更少。
这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究,纳入了在妇产科门诊接受胰岛素治疗的年龄在 18 岁及以上的 PGDM 或 GDM 孕妇。主要结局是低血糖(BG < 60mg/dL)的频率。次要结局包括急诊就诊和住院、分娩并发症以及妊娠期间达到血糖目标的时间。
共有 63 例患者接受评估。长效组和 NPH 组的低血糖频率无显著差异(分别为 4.4 次和 6.2 次/患者;=0.361)。接受长效胰岛素的患者接受糖尿病教育的次数明显更多(分别为 10.6 次和 5.1 次/患者;=0.002),并且在预约时更一致地提供血糖读数(分别为 8.3 次和 4.8 次;=0.043)。两组的住院率或母婴并发症无差异。
与 NPH 相比,长效胰岛素并未降低低血糖的发生频率。本研究结果证实需要更大人群的进一步研究。