Homer M J, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Safaii H, Pile-Spellman E R, Marchant D J, Smith T J, Kelly K, Robert N J
Department of Radiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Radiology. 1989 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):75-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909123.
The records of 21 consecutive patients referred for breast-conservation treatment of early-stage mammary carcinoma contained insufficient histopathologic documentation of adequate resection margins after tumor excision at other hospitals. All patients underwent postbiopsy mammography before reexcision of the tumor bed. In 12 of the 21 cases, there was pathologic evidence of macroscopic or microscopic residual tumor. In seven of the 12 cases, there was no clinical or mammographic evidence to suggest residual carcinoma. The findings indicate that mammography is insufficient to evaluate the completeness of tumor excision in the absence of histopathologic documentation.
21例因早期乳腺癌接受保乳治疗而转诊的连续患者的记录显示,其他医院在肿瘤切除后,足够切缘的组织病理学记录不足。所有患者在重新切除肿瘤床之前均接受了活检后乳腺钼靶检查。21例中有12例存在肉眼或显微镜下残留肿瘤的病理证据。12例中的7例没有临床或乳腺钼靶证据提示残留癌。这些发现表明,在没有组织病理学记录的情况下,乳腺钼靶检查不足以评估肿瘤切除的完整性。