Wollenman Lucas C, Vander Ploeg Matthew R, Miller Mackinzie L, Zhang Yizhu, Bazil Jason N
Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0187523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187523. eCollection 2017.
Functional studies on isolated mitochondria critically rely on the right choice of respiration buffer. Differences in buffer composition can lead to dramatically different respiration rates leading to difficulties in comparing prior studies. The ideal buffer facilities high ADP-stimulated respiratory rates and minimizes substrate transport effects so that the ability to distinguish between various treatments and conditions is maximal. In this study, we analyzed a variety of respiration buffers and substrate combinations to determine the optimal conditions to support mitochondrial function through ADP-stimulated respiration and uncoupled respiration using FCCP. The buffers consisted of a standard KCl based buffer (B1) and three modified buffers with chloride replaced by the K-lactobionate, sucrose, and the antioxidant taurine (B2) or K-gluconate (B3). The fourth buffer (B4) was identical to B2 except that K-lactobionate was replaced with K-gluconate. The substrate combinations consisted of metabolites that utilize different pathways of mitochondrial metabolism. To test mitochondrial function, we used isolated cardiac guinea pig mitochondria and measured oxygen consumption for three respiratory states using an Oroboros Oxygraph-2k. These states were the leak state (energized mitochondria in the absence of adenylates), ADP-stimulated state (energized mitochondria in the presence of saturating ADP concentrations), and uncoupled state (energized mitochondria in the presence of FCCP). On average across all substrate combinations, buffers B2, B3, and B4 had an increase of 16%, 26%, and 35% for the leak state, ADP-simulated state, and uncoupled state, respectively, relative to rates using B1. The common feature distinguishing these buffers from B1 is the notable lack of high chloride concentrations. Based on the respiratory rate metrics obtained with the substrate combinations, we conclude that the adenine nucleotide translocase, the dicarboxylate carrier, and the alpha-ketoglutarate exchanger are partially inhibited by chloride. Therefore, when the goal is to maximize ADP-stimulated respiration, buffers containing K-lactobionate or K-gluconate are superior choices compared to the standard KCl-based buffers.
对分离的线粒体进行功能研究严重依赖于呼吸缓冲液的正确选择。缓冲液成分的差异可能导致呼吸速率显著不同,从而难以比较先前的研究。理想的缓冲液应具备高ADP刺激的呼吸速率,并使底物转运效应最小化,以便最大程度地区分各种处理和条件。在本研究中,我们分析了多种呼吸缓冲液和底物组合,以确定通过ADP刺激的呼吸作用和使用FCCP的解偶联呼吸作用来支持线粒体功能的最佳条件。这些缓冲液包括一种基于KCl的标准缓冲液(B1)和三种改良缓冲液,其中氯化物分别被乳糖酸钾、蔗糖和抗氧化剂牛磺酸(B2)或葡萄糖酸钾(B3)取代。第四种缓冲液(B4)与B2相同,只是用葡萄糖酸钾取代了乳糖酸钾。底物组合由利用线粒体代谢不同途径的代谢物组成。为了测试线粒体功能,我们使用分离的豚鼠心脏线粒体,并使用Oroboros Oxygraph-2k测量三种呼吸状态下的氧气消耗。这些状态分别是泄漏状态(无腺苷酸时的活跃线粒体)、ADP刺激状态(存在饱和ADP浓度时的活跃线粒体)和解偶联状态(存在FCCP时的活跃线粒体)。在所有底物组合中,平均而言,相对于使用B1时的速率,缓冲液B2、B3和B4在泄漏状态、ADP模拟状态和解偶联状态下的呼吸速率分别提高了16%、26%和35%。这些缓冲液与B1的区别在于显著缺乏高浓度的氯化物。根据底物组合获得的呼吸速率指标,我们得出结论,腺嘌呤核苷酸转运体、二羧酸载体和α-酮戊二酸交换体受到氯化物的部分抑制。因此,当目标是最大化ADP刺激的呼吸作用时,与基于KCl的标准缓冲液相比,含有乳糖酸钾或葡萄糖酸钾的缓冲液是更好的选择。