Soucek Dana K, Dumkow Lisa E, VanLangen Kali M, Jameson Andrew P
1 Department of Pharmacy, St Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, MI, USA.
2 Department of Pharmacy, Mercy Health Saint Mary's Campus, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Feb;32(1):36-40. doi: 10.1177/0897190017737697. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Gram stain and culture along with CSF viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the current standard of care (SOC) to diagnose meningitis. Unfortunately, these tests take up to 72 hours to provide results and are not always sensitive to detect a pathogen. BioFire FilmArray (FA) meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel uses PCR to provide quick, accurate identification of the causative organism. For community hospitals, the cost of this technology may be prohibitive.
: To compare the institution cost of current SOC versus the anticipated cost of the FA ME panel to diagnose and treat suspected meningitis.
: A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating adult patients with a lumbar puncture performed and empiric antimicrobials administered for a diagnosis of meningitis. The time to receive CSF culture results and cost associated with empiric antimicrobials were assessed and compared to the theoretical time to results and cost of treatment using the FA ME panel.
: Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis. The cost of antimicrobials using SOC was $63.43 versus $24.70 per treatment course if using the FA ME panel ( P < .001). When the cost of diagnostic testing supplies per patient was included, the median cost of SOC was $239.63 versus $239.14 per treatment course when using the FA ME panel ( P = .15).
: There is potential for significant cost savings in direct antibiotic utilization if FA ME is used versus SOC to diagnose meningitis in a community hospital. Antimicrobial cost savings were able to offset the increased cost of testing.
脑脊液(CSF)革兰氏染色和培养以及脑脊液病毒聚合酶链反应(PCR)是目前诊断脑膜炎的标准治疗方法(SOC)。不幸的是,这些检测需要长达72小时才能出结果,而且并非总能灵敏地检测出病原体。BioFire FilmArray(FA)脑膜炎/脑炎(ME)检测板利用PCR技术快速、准确地鉴定病原体。对于社区医院来说,这项技术的成本可能过高。
比较当前标准治疗方法的机构成本与FA ME检测板诊断和治疗疑似脑膜炎的预期成本。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究,评估接受腰椎穿刺并使用经验性抗菌药物进行脑膜炎诊断的成年患者。评估获得脑脊液培养结果的时间以及与经验性抗菌药物相关的成本,并与使用FA ME检测板的理论出结果时间和治疗成本进行比较。
33名患者纳入分析。使用标准治疗方法时抗菌药物的成本为每次治疗疗程63.43美元,而使用FA ME检测板时为每次治疗疗程24.70美元(P <.001)。当纳入每位患者的诊断检测用品成本时,标准治疗方法的中位数成本为每次治疗疗程239.63美元,而使用FA ME检测板时为239.14美元(P = 0.15)。
在社区医院中,与标准治疗方法相比,使用FA ME检测板诊断脑膜炎在直接抗生素使用方面有可能大幅节省成本。抗菌药物成本的节省能够抵消检测成本的增加。