Suppr超能文献

AR101 在花生过敏口服免疫治疗中的疗效和安全性:ARC001 的结果,一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 2 期临床试验。

Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.

Division of Allergy & Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):476-485.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peanut oral immunotherapy, using a variety of approaches, has been previously shown to induce desensitization in peanut-allergic subjects, but no products have been approved for clinical use by regulatory agencies.

OBJECTIVE

We performed the first phase 2 multicentered study to assess the safety and efficacy of AR101, a novel oral biologic drug product.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 8 US centers. Eligible subjects were 4 to 26 years old, sensitized to peanut, and had dose-limiting symptoms to ≤143 mg of peanut protein in a screening double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to daily AR101 or placebo and gradually up-dosed from 0.5 to 300 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects in each arm able to tolerate ≥443 mg (cumulative peanut protein) at exit DBPCFC with no or mild symptoms.

RESULTS

Fifty-five subjects (29 AR101, 26 placebo) were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 23 of 29 (79%) and 18 of 29 (62%) AR101 subjects tolerated ≥443 mg and 1043 mg at exit DBPCFC, respectively, versus 5 of 26 (19%) and 0 of 26 (0%) placebo subjects (both P < .0001). Compared with placebo, AR101 significantly reduced symptom severity during exit DBPCFCs and modulated peanut-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in both groups, with 6 AR101 subjects (21%) withdrawing, 4 of those due primarily to recurrent GI AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, AR101 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated clinical activity as a potential immunomodulatory treatment option in peanut-allergic children over the age of 4, adolescents, and young adults.

摘要

背景

通过各种方法进行的花生口服免疫治疗已被证明可使花生过敏患者脱敏,但尚未有产品获得监管机构批准用于临床。

目的

我们进行了第一项评估新型口服生物药物 AR101 的安全性和疗效的 2 期多中心研究。

方法

在 8 个美国中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。合格的受试者年龄在 4 至 26 岁之间,对花生过敏,且在筛选性双盲、安慰剂对照食物挑战(DBPCFC)中对 ≤143mg 花生蛋白有剂量限制症状。受试者按 1:1 随机分配至每日接受 AR101 或安慰剂,并逐渐从 0.5 至 300mg/天进行递增剂量。主要终点是退出时 DBPCFC 中每个臂能够耐受 ≥443mg(累计花生蛋白)且无或仅有轻度症状的受试者比例。

结果

共纳入 55 名受试者(29 名 AR101,26 名安慰剂)。在意向治疗分析中,29 名 AR101 受试者中有 23 名(79%)和 18 名(62%)耐受 ≥443mg 和 1043mg 退出时的 DBPCFC,而 26 名安慰剂受试者中仅有 5 名(19%)和 0 名(0%)耐受≥443mg 和 1043mg 退出时的 DBPCFC(均 P <.0001)。与安慰剂相比,AR101 显著降低了退出时 DBPCFC 中的症状严重程度,并调节了花生特异性细胞和体液免疫反应。胃肠道(GI)症状是两组中最常见的治疗相关不良事件(AE),6 名 AR101 受试者(21%)停药,其中 4 名主要因反复出现 GI AE 而停药。

结论

在这项研究中,AR101 表现出可接受的安全性特征,并显示出作为一种潜在的免疫调节治疗选择,在 4 岁以上的花生过敏儿童、青少年和年轻成人中具有临床活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验