Suppr超能文献

对接受花生过敏口服免疫疗法的个体在食物激发试验期间症状严重程度降低和无症状情况的事后分析:三项试验的结果

Post hoc analysis examining symptom severity reduction and symptom absence during food challenges in individuals who underwent oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: results from three trials.

作者信息

Blumchen Katharina, Kleinheinz Andreas, Klimek Ludger, Beyer Kirsten, Anagnostou Aikaterini, Vogelberg Christian, Butovas Sergejus, Ryan Robert, Norval David, Zeitler Stefan, Du Toit George

机构信息

Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Allergology, Pneumology and Cystic Fibrosis, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Mar 13;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00757-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Peanut allergy and its current management, involving peanut avoidance and use of rescue medication during instances of accidental exposure, are burdensome to patients and their caregivers and can be a source of stress, uncertainty, and restriction. Physicians may also be frustrated with a lack of effective and safe treatments other than avoidance in the current management of peanut allergy. Efficacy, determined using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs), of oral immunotherapy with peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH; Palforzia) was demonstrated versus placebo in children and adolescents aged 4 to 17 years in multiple phase 3 trials; continued benefit of PTAH was shown in a follow-on trial. The DBPCFC is a reproducible, rigorous, and clinically meaningful assessment accepted by regulatory authorities to evaluate the level of tolerance as an endpoint for accidental exposures to peanut in real life. It also provides useful clinical and patient-relevant information, including the amount of peanut protein an individual with peanut allergy can consume without experiencing dose-limiting symptoms, severity of symptoms, and organs affected upon ingestion of peanut protein. We explored symptoms of peanut exposure during DBPCFCs from phase 3 and follow-on trials of PTAH to further characterize treatment efficacy from a perspective relevant to patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

METHODS

Symptom data recorded during screening and/or exit DBPCFCs from participants aged 4 to 17 years receiving PTAH or placebo were examined post hoc across three PTAH trials (PALISADE [ARC003], ARC004 [PALISADE follow-on], and ARTEMIS [ARC010]). The maximum peanut protein administered as a single dose during DBPCFCs was 1000 mg (PALISADE and ARTEMIS) and 2000 mg (ARC004). Symptoms were classified by system organ class (SOC) and maximum severity. Endpoints were changes in symptom severity and freedom from symptoms (ie, asymptomatic) during DBPCFC. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for symptom severity by SOC and freedom from symptoms between groups; descriptive statistics were used to summarize all other data.

RESULTS

The risk of any respiratory (RR 0.42 [0.30-0.60], P < 0.0001), gastrointestinal (RR 0.34 [0.26-0.44], P < 0.0001), cardiovascular/neurological (RR 0.17 [0.08-0.39], P < 0.001), or dermatological (RR 0.33 [0.22-0.50], P < 0.0001) symptoms was significantly lower in participants treated with PTAH versus placebo upon exposure to peanut at the end of the PALISADE trial (ie, exit DBPCFC). Compared with placebo-treated participants (23.4%), the majority (76.3%) of PTAH-treated participants had no symptoms at the exit DBPCFC when tested at the peanut protein dose not tolerated (ie, reactive dose) during the screening DBPCFC. Significantly higher proportions of PTAH-treated participants were asymptomatic at doses ≤ 100 mg in the exit DBPCFC compared with placebo-treated participants (PALISADE: 69.35% vs 12.10%, RR 5.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.55-9.26]; P < 0.0001; ARTEMIS: 67.42% vs 13.95%, RR 4.83 [95% CI 2.28-10.25]; P < 0.0001); findings were similar at peanut protein doses ≤ 1000 mg (PALISADE: RR 15.56 [95% CI 5.05-47.94]; P < 0.0001; ARTEMIS: RR 34.74 [95% CI 2.19-551.03]; P < 0.0001). In ARC004, as the period of PTAH maintenance became longer, greater proportions of participants were asymptomatic at doses of peanut protein ≤ 1000 mg in the exit DBPCFC (from 37.63% after ~ 6 months of maintenance treatment [exit DBPCFC of PALISADE] to 45.54% after ~ 13 months and 58.06% after ~ 20 months of overall PTAH maintenance treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

PTAH significantly reduced symptom severity due to exposure to peanut, which is clinically relevant. When exposed to peanut, participants with peanut allergy treated with PTAH rarely had moderate or severe respiratory or cardiovascular/neurological symptoms. Oral immunotherapy with PTAH appears to reduce frequency and severity of allergic reactions in individuals with peanut allergy after accidental exposure to peanut and may enable them and their families to have an improved quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02635776, registered 17 December 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02635776?term=AR101&draw=2&rank=7 ; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02993107, registered 08 December 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02993107?term=AR101&draw=2&rank=6 ; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03201003, registered 22 June 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03201003 ? term = AR101&draw = 2&rank = 9.

摘要

目的

花生过敏及其当前的管理方式,包括避免接触花生以及在意外接触时使用急救药物,给患者及其护理人员带来了负担,并且可能成为压力、不确定性和限制的来源。除了避免接触花生之外,目前花生过敏的管理缺乏有效且安全的治疗方法,这也可能让医生感到沮丧。在多项3期试验中,与安慰剂相比,4至17岁儿童和青少年使用花生(落花生)过敏原粉末 - 去敏纯化提取物(PTAH;Palforzia)进行口服免疫疗法,通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)确定了其疗效;在一项后续试验中显示了PTAH的持续益处。DBPCFC是一种可重复、严格且具有临床意义的评估方法,已被监管机构接受,用于评估耐受性水平,作为现实生活中意外接触花生的终点指标。它还提供了有用的临床和与患者相关的信息,包括花生过敏个体在不出现剂量限制症状的情况下可摄入的花生蛋白量、症状严重程度以及摄入花生蛋白后受影响的器官。我们从PTAH的3期试验和后续试验的DBPCFC中探索了花生接触的症状,以从与患者、护理人员和临床医生相关的角度进一步表征治疗效果。

方法

对接受PTAH或安慰剂治疗的4至17岁参与者在筛查和/或退出DBPCFC期间记录的症状数据进行事后分析,涉及三项PTAH试验(PALISADE [ARC003]、ARC004 [PALISADE后续试验]和ARTEMIS [ARC010])。DBPCFC期间作为单剂量给予的最大花生蛋白量为1000 mg(PALISADE和ARTEMIS)和2000 mg(ARC004)。症状按系统器官类别(SOC)和最大严重程度进行分类。终点指标为DBPCFC期间症状严重程度的变化和无症状情况(即无任何症状)。计算了不同SOC症状严重程度和两组之间无症状情况的相对风险(RR);使用描述性统计来汇总所有其他数据。

结果

在PALISADE试验结束时(即退出DBPCFC)接触花生时,接受PTAH治疗的参与者出现任何呼吸道症状(RR 0.42 [0.30 - 0.60],P < 0.0001)、胃肠道症状(RR 0.34 [0.26 - 0.44],P < 0.0001)、心血管/神经症状(RR 0.17 [0.08 - 0.39],P < 0.001)或皮肤症状(RR 0.33 [0.22 - 0.50],P < 0.0001)的风险显著低于接受安慰剂治疗的参与者。与接受安慰剂治疗的参与者(23.4%)相比,在筛查DBPCFC期间测试的不耐受花生蛋白剂量(即反应剂量)下,大多数接受PTAH治疗的参与者(76.3%)在退出DBPCFC时无症状。与接受安慰剂治疗的参与者相比,在退出DBPCFC时,接受PTAH治疗的参与者在≤100 mg剂量下无症状的比例显著更高(PALISADE:69.35%对12.10%,RR 5.73 [95%置信区间(CI)3.55 - 9.26];P < 0.0001;ARTEMIS:67.42%对13.95%,RR 4.83 [95% CI 2.28 - 10.25];P < 0.0001);在花生蛋白剂量≤1000 mg时结果相似(PALISADE:RR 15.56 [95% CI 5.05 - 47.94];P < 0.0001;ARTEMIS:RR 34.74 [95% CI 2.19 - 551.03];P < 0.0001)。在ARC004中,随着PTAH维持期变长,在退出DBPCFC时,花生蛋白剂量≤1000 mg时无症状的参与者比例更高(从维持治疗约6个月后(PALISADE的退出DBPCFC)的37.63%,到约13个月后的45.54%和约20个月总体PTAH维持治疗后的58.06%)。

结论

PTAH显著降低了因接触花生导致的症状严重程度,这具有临床相关性。接触花生时,接受PTAH治疗的花生过敏参与者很少出现中度或重度呼吸道或心血管/神经症状。使用PTAH进行口服免疫疗法似乎可以降低花生过敏个体在意外接触花生后过敏反应的频率和严重程度,并可能使他们及其家人的生活质量得到改善。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02635776,于2015年12月17日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02635776?term=AR101&draw=2&rank=7 ;ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02993107,于 2016年12月8日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02993107?term=AR101&draw=2&rank=6 ;ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03201003,于2017年6月22日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03201003?term=AR101&draw=2&rank=9

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d5c/10009988/6d7a29858b44/13223_2023_757_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验