Williams J H, Bencowitz H Z
Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
Chest. 1989 Jan;95(1):117-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.1.117.
Determination of absolute lung volumes in patients is most reliable when measured with body plethysmography. Many laboratories use data obtained with a spirometer not directly linked to the plethysmograph to calculate total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV) from thoracic gas volume (Vtg) measured at functional residual capacity (FRC) in the plethysmograph. The reliability of these calculations depends on the stability of FRC between these separate devices. We examined the differences in TLC and RV values calculated with linked and unlinked spirometers in 220 patients and found them statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Additionally, differences exceeding the 95 percent confidence intervals for repeated, linked determinations occurred in more than 5 percent of patients. The large-volume differences in TLC were often associated with differences in expiratory reserve volume (ERV) in the opposite direction, suggesting a shift in FRC. However, clinical diagnoses were infrequently (4/220) altered by these differences, and recognition of the shift in FRC should further reduce this error. Therefore, the unlinked method appears acceptable.
对于患者绝对肺容积的测定,使用体容积描记法测量时最为可靠。许多实验室使用与体积描记器未直接相连的肺活量计所获得的数据,根据在体积描记器中功能残气量(FRC)时测得的胸廓气体容积(Vtg)来计算肺总量(TLC)和残气量(RV)。这些计算的可靠性取决于这些独立设备之间FRC的稳定性。我们检查了220例患者使用相连和不相连肺活量计计算出的TLC和RV值的差异,发现差异具有统计学意义(p小于0.05)。此外,超过5%的患者出现了超过重复相连测定95%置信区间的差异。TLC的大容积差异通常与呼气储备量(ERV)在相反方向的差异相关,提示FRC发生了偏移。然而,这些差异很少(4/220)改变临床诊断,并且认识到FRC的偏移应能进一步减少这种误差。因此,不相连的方法似乎是可以接受的。