Gerard Juliana, Lidz Jeffrey, Zuckerman Shalom, Pinto Manuela
School of Communication and Media, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 18;8:1822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822. eCollection 2017.
Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like "." While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children's errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.
先前关于附加语控制习得的研究观察到,对于像“.”这样的句子,儿童存在非成人式的行为表现。虽然成年人对这些句子只允许主语控制的解释(即约翰在人行道上绊倒),但据报道,学龄前儿童允许更广泛的解释。为了确定儿童错误的语法根源,人们使用了许多不同的任务。在本文中,我们考虑语法外因素的作用。在两项理解实验中,我们证明,当前项与线性介入的名词短语之间的相似度增加时,错误率会上升,首先是性别相似度,其次是数标记相似度。这表明,附加语控制方面的困难(至少部分地)可以通过成年人基于相似度的干扰所依据的句子处理机制来解释。