Suppr超能文献

2016年墨尔本雷暴哮喘疫情:哮喘、鼻炎及其他既往过敏情况。

An epidemic of thunderstorm asthma in Melbourne 2016: asthma, rhinitis, and other previous allergies.

作者信息

Rangamuwa Kanishka B, Young Alan C, Thien Francis

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac Allergy. 2017 Oct;7(4):193-198. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2017.7.4.193. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On 21st November 2016, Melbourne experienced an epidemic of 'thunderstorm asthma.' Although previously described in the literature, risk factors and natural history remain incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to follow up those presenting to the 3 Emergency Departments (EDs) in our health service during the epidemic, and assess their history for previous asthma, rhinitis, and allergies.

METHODS

ED notes of all respiratory presentations within 48 hours of the thunderstorm event were reviewed and patients with acute asthma included. A standardised questionnaire was devised encompassing asthma diagnosis, undiagnosed asthma symptoms and rhinitis severity. Patients were contacted by phone within 30 days of the event.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-four patients were identified overall; 263 patients were contactable and completed a phone or mail questionnaire. The mean age was 32.7 ± 19.2 years (range, 6 months-87 years; 25% < 18 years) with 58% male sex. A previous diagnosis of asthma was present in 42% (n = 111), and there was no previous asthma diagnosis in 58% (n = 152). Of those who had no asthma diagnosis 53% had probable undiagnosed asthma. Overall, rhinitis prevalence was 88%, of which 72% were moderate or severe (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guidelines) and 51% (n = 133) reported a history of grass pollen allergy.

CONCLUSION

Our data highlights the importance of atopy and rhinitis as risk factors for epidemic thunderstorm asthma. Better identification of undiagnosed asthma, and implementing treatment of asthma and rhinitis may be important.

摘要

背景

2016年11月21日,墨尔本经历了一场“雷暴哮喘”疫情。尽管此前文献中有相关描述,但风险因素和自然病史仍未完全明确。

目的

我们的目的是对疫情期间在我们医疗服务机构的3个急诊科就诊的患者进行随访,并评估他们既往的哮喘、鼻炎和过敏病史。

方法

回顾雷暴事件发生后48小时内所有呼吸道疾病就诊记录,并纳入急性哮喘患者。设计了一份标准化问卷,涵盖哮喘诊断、未诊断的哮喘症状和鼻炎严重程度。在事件发生后30天内通过电话联系患者。

结果

共识别出344例患者;263例患者可联系上并完成了电话或邮件问卷。平均年龄为32.7±19.2岁(范围6个月至87岁;25%<18岁),男性占58%。42%(n=111)的患者既往有哮喘诊断,58%(n=152)的患者既往无哮喘诊断。在那些无哮喘诊断的患者中,53%可能患有未诊断的哮喘。总体而言,鼻炎患病率为88%,其中72%为中度或重度(《变应性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响指南》),51%(n=133)报告有草花粉过敏史。

结论

我们的数据突出了特应性和鼻炎作为雷暴哮喘疫情风险因素的重要性。更好地识别未诊断的哮喘,并实施哮喘和鼻炎治疗可能很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fb7/5663746/35a74fcc3a30/apa-7-193-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验