University of Missouri, Kansas City.
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1315-1321. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3983.
While there is increasing emphasis on incorporating patient-reported outcome measures in routine care for patients with heart failure (HF), how best to interpret longitudinally collected patient-reported outcome measures is unknown.
To examine the strength of association between prior, current, or a change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores with death and hospitalization in patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fractions.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Secondary analyses of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial of 1372 patients with HFpEF, conducted between August 2006 and January 2012, and the HF-ACTION trial that included 1669 patients with HFrEF, conducted between April 2003 and February 2007.
Prior, current, and change in KCCQ Overall Summary scores (KCCQ-os) in 5-point increments (higher scores indicate better health status).
Time to cardiovascular death/first HF hospitalization (primary outcome) and all-cause death (secondary outcome).
Of 1767 eligible TOPCAT participants, 882 were women (49.9%), and the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (9.7) years. Of 2130 eligible HF-ACTION participants, 599 were women (28.1%), and the mean age was 58.6 (12.7) years. Each 5-point difference in prior or current KCCQ-os scores was associated with a 6% (95% CI, 4%-8%; P < .001) to 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%; P < .001) lower risk for subsequent cardiovascular death/first HF hospitalization in patients with HFpEF and 6% (95% CI, 4%-9%; P < .001) to 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; P < .001) lower risk for subsequent cardiovascular death/first HF hospitalization in patients with HRpEF and HFrEF in unadjusted analyses. Results were similar for change in KCCQ-os. In models with the prior and current KCCQ-os, only the current KCCQ-os was significantly associated with 10% (95% CI, 7%-12%; P < .001) and 7% (95% CI, 3%-11%; P < .001) lower risk for subsequent cardiovascular death/first HF hospitalization in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively. Similar results were observed when the current and Δ KCCQ-os were considered together, when adjusted for important patient and treatment characteristics, when including 3 sequential KCCQ-os scores, and when examining all-cause death as the outcome.
In serial health status evaluations of patients with HF, the most recent KCCQ score was most strongly associated with subsequent death and cardiovascular hospitalization in HFpEF and HFrEF. Measuring serial patient-reported outcome measures in the clinical care of patients with HF can provide an updated assessment of prognosis.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094302 (TOPCAT) and NCT00047437 (HF-ACTION).
虽然越来越强调将患者报告的结局测量纳入心力衰竭(HF)患者的常规护理中,但如何最好地解释纵向收集的患者报告的结局测量尚不清楚。
检查堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分的既往、当前或变化与射血分数保留(HFpEF)和降低(HFrEF)心力衰竭患者死亡和住院的相关性。
设计、地点和参与者:在 2006 年 8 月至 2012 年 1 月进行的治疗保留心脏功能心力衰竭的醛固酮拮抗剂(TOPCAT)试验的 1372 例 HFpEF 患者和 2003 年 4 月至 2007 年 2 月进行的心力衰竭-行动(HF-ACTION)试验的 1669 例 HFrEF 患者的二次分析。
堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总体摘要评分(KCCQ-os)的既往、当前和变化(每增加 5 分表示健康状况更好)。
心血管死亡/首次心力衰竭住院的时间(主要结局)和全因死亡(次要结局)。
在 1767 名符合条件的 TOPCAT 参与者中,882 名女性(49.9%),平均(SD)年龄为 71.5(9.7)岁。在 2130 名符合条件的 HF-ACTION 参与者中,599 名女性(28.1%),平均年龄为 58.6(12.7)岁。既往或当前 KCCQ-os 评分每增加 5 分,与 HFpEF 患者随后发生心血管死亡/首次心力衰竭住院的风险降低 6%(95%CI,4%-8%;P<0.001)至 9%(95%CI,7%-11%;P<0.001)和 HRpEF 患者随后发生心血管死亡/首次心力衰竭住院的风险降低 6%(95%CI,4%-9%;P<0.001)至 8%(95%CI,5%-10%;P<0.001)相关,在未调整的分析中。对于 KCCQ-os 的变化,结果相似。在包含既往和当前 KCCQ-os 的模型中,只有当前 KCCQ-os 与 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者随后发生心血管死亡/首次心力衰竭住院的风险降低 10%(95%CI,7%-12%;P<0.001)和 7%(95%CI,3%-11%;P<0.001)显著相关。当同时考虑当前和Δ KCCQ-os 时,当根据重要的患者和治疗特征进行调整时,当包括 3 个连续的 KCCQ-os 评分时,以及当将全因死亡作为结局时,观察到类似的结果。
在 HF 患者的连续健康状况评估中,最近的 KCCQ 评分与 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者随后的死亡和心血管住院最密切相关。在 HF 患者的临床护理中测量连续的患者报告的结局测量可以提供预后的更新评估。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT000094302(TOPCAT)和 NCT00047437(HF-ACTION)。