Francis Abbie, Fatovich Daniel M, Arendts Glenn, Macdonald Stephen Pj, Bosio Erika, Nagree Yusuf, Mitenko Hugh Ma, Brown Simon Ga
Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Jun;30(3):366-374. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12875. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis is principally based on symptoms and signs. However, particularly for patients with atypical symptoms, laboratory confirmation of anaphylaxis would be useful. This study investigated the utility of mast cell tryptase, an available clinical biomarker, for differentiating anaphylaxis from other causes of critical illness, which can also involve mast cell activation.
Tryptase was measured (ImmunoCAP) in serum from patients with anaphylaxis and non-anaphylactic critical illness (controls) at ED arrival, and after 1-2, 3-4 and 12-24 h. Differences in both peak and delta (difference between highest and lowest) tryptase concentrations between groups were investigated using linear regression models, and diagnostic ability was analysed using Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis.
Peak tryptase was fourfold (95% CI: 2.9, 5.5) higher in anaphylaxis patients (n = 67) than controls (n = 120) (P < 0.001). Delta-tryptase was 5.1-fold (95% CI: 2.9, 8.9) higher in anaphylaxis than controls (P < 0.001). Optimal test characteristics (sensitivity: 72% [95% CI: 59, 82] and specificity: 72% [95%CI: 63, 80]) were observed when peak tryptase concentrations were >11.4 ng/mL and/or delta-tryptase ≥2.0 ng/mL. For hypotensive patients, peak tryptase >11.4 ng/mL had improved test characteristics (sensitivity: 85% [95% CI: 65, 96] and specificity: 92% [95% CI: 85, 97]); the use of delta-tryptase reduced test specificity.
While peak and delta tryptase concentrations were higher in anaphylaxis than other forms of critical illness, the test lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, mast cell tryptase values alone cannot be used to establish the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in the ED. In particular, tryptase has limited utility for differentiating anaphylactic from non-anaphylactic shock.
过敏反应的临床诊断主要基于症状和体征。然而,特别是对于症状不典型的患者,过敏反应的实验室确诊会很有用。本研究调查了肥大细胞类胰蛋白酶(一种可用的临床生物标志物)在区分过敏反应与其他也可涉及肥大细胞活化的危重病病因方面的效用。
在急诊科就诊时以及1 - 2小时、3 - 4小时和12 - 24小时后,对过敏反应患者和非过敏性危重病患者(对照组)的血清进行类胰蛋白酶检测(免疫化学发光法)。使用线性回归模型研究两组之间类胰蛋白酶峰值浓度和增量(最高值与最低值之差)的差异,并使用受试者工作特征曲线分析来分析诊断能力。
过敏反应患者(n = 67)的类胰蛋白酶峰值比对照组(n = 120)高4倍(95%可信区间:2.9,5.5)(P < 0.001)。过敏反应患者的类胰蛋白酶增量比对照组高5.1倍(95%可信区间:2.9,8.9)(P < 0.001)。当类胰蛋白酶峰值浓度>11.4 ng/mL和/或类胰蛋白酶增量≥2.0 ng/mL时,观察到最佳检测特征(敏感性:72% [95%可信区间:59,82],特异性:72% [95%可信区间:63,80])。对于低血压患者,类胰蛋白酶峰值>11.4 ng/mL具有更好的检测特征(敏感性:85% [95%可信区间:65,96],特异性:92% [95%可信区间:85,97]);使用类胰蛋白酶增量会降低检测特异性。
虽然过敏反应患者的类胰蛋白酶峰值浓度和增量高于其他形式的危重病,但该检测缺乏足够的敏感性和特异性。因此,仅肥大细胞类胰蛋白酶值不能用于在急诊科确诊过敏反应。特别是,类胰蛋白酶在区分过敏性休克与非过敏性休克方面效用有限。