Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020 Jun;58(3):366-376. doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08777-7.
The diagnosis of anaphylaxis relies on a suggestive clinical history after exposure to a potential triggering factor. Serum tryptase concentrations increase on degranulation of mast cells and therefore serum tryptase levels are measured to diagnose anaphylaxis. There is no standardized method for assessing total serum mast cell tryptase (MCT) in anaphylaxis. The Working Conference in 2010 proposed a consensus equation (peak MCT should be > 1.2x baseline tryptase + 2 ng/L) to diagnose acute mast cell activation (aMCA). Our objective was to narratively review the literature since the Working Conference in 2010, examining the use of the consensus equation and other equations comparing baseline and peak serum tryptase during anaphylaxis. Computerized bibliographic searches of PUBMED and EMBASE were supplemented with a manual search of reference lists. English-language studies were included. Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 4551 participants. However, only four studies with 653 participants used the consensus equation. The other seven studies used other methods to compare peak and baseline serum tryptase concentrations. Measuring serum tryptase levels is valuable in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis but is unable to detect all anaphylactic reactions. Based on our current literature review, the consensus equation is underused in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. There is also a need for exploration of other biomarkers which could be used in parallel to peak and baseline serum tryptase measurements for further diagnostic certainty. Serum tryptase is the most studied biomarker in anaphylaxis but is still far from being the ideal biomarker for this. There is a need to identify new potential useful biomarkers. Serum tryptase levels are valuable in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, but are unable to detect all anaphylactic reactions. Additionally serial tryptase measurements are laborious in daily clinical practice.
诊断过敏反应依赖于暴露于潜在触发因素后具有提示性的临床病史。肥大细胞脱颗粒时血清类胰蛋白酶浓度增加,因此测量血清类胰蛋白酶水平可诊断过敏反应。目前尚无用于评估过敏反应中总血清肥大细胞类胰蛋白酶 (MCT) 的标准化方法。2010 年的工作组会议提出了一个共识方程(峰值 MCT 应>1.2x 基线类胰蛋白酶+2ng/L),用于诊断急性肥大细胞激活 (aMCA)。我们的目的是自 2010 年工作组会议以来,对文献进行叙述性综述,检查共识方程和其他比较过敏反应期间基线和峰值血清类胰蛋白酶的方程的使用情况。计算机化的 PUBMED 和 EMBASE 书目搜索辅以手动搜索参考文献列表。纳入了英语语言的研究。共有 11 项研究符合纳入标准,共有 4551 名参与者。然而,只有 4 项研究(653 名参与者)使用了共识方程。其他 7 项研究使用了其他方法来比较峰值和基线血清类胰蛋白酶浓度。测量血清类胰蛋白酶水平对过敏反应的诊断很有价值,但无法检测所有过敏反应。根据我们目前的文献综述,共识方程在过敏反应的诊断中使用不足。还需要探索其他生物标志物,这些标志物可以与峰值和基线血清类胰蛋白酶测量一起用于进一步提高诊断确定性。血清类胰蛋白酶是过敏反应中研究最多的生物标志物,但距离成为理想的生物标志物还有很长的路要走。需要识别新的潜在有用的生物标志物。血清类胰蛋白酶水平对过敏反应的诊断很有价值,但无法检测所有过敏反应。此外,在日常临床实践中,连续进行类胰蛋白酶测量很繁琐。