The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Dec;76(6):758-783. doi: 10.1177/1077558717739214. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Dramatic improvements in reported nursing home quality, including staffing ratios, have come under increased scrutiny in recent years because they are based on data self-reported by nursing homes. In contrast to other domains, the key mechanism for real improvement in the staffing ratios domain is clearer: to improve scores, nursing homes should increase staffing expenditures. We analyze the relationship between changes in expenditures and reported staffing quality pre- versus post the 5-star rating system. Our results show that the relationship between expenditures and licensed practical nurse staffing is weaker in the post-5-star period, overall, and across subgroups; furthermore, there is a weaker relationship between expenditures and registered nurse staffing among for-profit facilities with a high share of Medicaid residents in the post-5-star period. The weaker relationship between staffing expenditures and staffing scores in the post-5-star era underscores the potential for gaming of the self-reported staffing scores and the need for more reliable sources.
近年来,养老院的报告质量(包括人员配备比例)有了显著提高,这引起了越来越多的关注,因为这些数据是养老院自行报告的。与其他领域不同,提高人员配备比例领域的关键机制更加明确:要提高分数,养老院应该增加人员配备支出。我们分析了 5 星级评级系统前后支出变化与报告人员配备质量之间的关系。结果表明,总的来说,在 5 星级之后,支出与持照实习护士人员配备之间的关系较弱,而且在 5 星级之后,营利性机构中 Medicaid 居民比例较高的机构,支出与注册护士人员配备之间的关系也较弱。5 星级之后,人员配备支出与人员配备分数之间的关系较弱,这突显了自行报告的人员配备分数存在操纵的可能性,需要更可靠的来源。