Konetzka R Tamara, Werner Rachel M
Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC2007, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Oct;66(5):491-521. doi: 10.1177/1077558709331813. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
A growing body of evidence documents pervasive racial, ethnic, and class disparities in long-term care in the United States. At the same time, major quality improvement initiatives are being implemented that rely on market-based incentives, many of which may have the unintended consequence of exacerbating disparities. We review existing evidence on disparities in the use and quality of long-term care services, analyze current market-based policy initiatives in terms of their potential to ameliorate or exacerbate these disparities, and suggest policies and policy modifications that may help decrease disparities. We find that racial disparities in the use of formal long-term care have decreased over time. Disparities in quality of care are more consistently documented and appear to be related to racial and socioeconomic segregation of long-term care facilities as opposed to within-provider discrimination. Market-based incentives policies should explicitly incorporate the goal of mitigating the potential unintended consequence of increased disparities.
越来越多的证据表明,美国长期护理领域存在普遍的种族、族裔和阶层差异。与此同时,正在实施一些主要的质量改进举措,这些举措依赖于市场激励措施,其中许多可能会产生加剧差异的意外后果。我们回顾了关于长期护理服务使用和质量差异的现有证据,分析了当前基于市场的政策举措在改善或加剧这些差异方面的潜力,并提出了可能有助于减少差异的政策和政策调整建议。我们发现,随着时间的推移,使用正规长期护理方面的种族差异有所减少。护理质量差异的记录更为一致,似乎与长期护理机构的种族和社会经济隔离有关,而不是与机构内部的歧视有关。基于市场的激励政策应明确纳入减轻差异加剧这一潜在意外后果的目标。