• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于诊所的早期读写能力项目在改变亲子早期读写习惯方面的有效性。

Effectiveness of a Clinic-Based Early Literacy Program in Changing Parent-Child Early Literacy Habits.

作者信息

Fricke Jonathan, Navsaria Dipesh, Mahony Karin

出版信息

WMJ. 2016 Dec;115(6):300-5.

PMID:29094863
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reach Out and Read (ROR) improves children's development and kindergarten readiness by encouraging parents to routinely share books with their children. Primary care providers give age-appropriate books and anticipatory guidance on reading at each well-child visit. This study evaluated parent attitudes and behaviors of early literacy related to ROR participation in Wisconsin clinics.

METHODS

A survey of early literacy attitudes and behaviors was administered to parents of children ages 6 months to 5 years in 36 Wisconsin clinics. Ten clinics were established ROR sites (intervention group) and 26 clinics had applied to become ROR programs but had not yet initiated the program (control group).

RESULTS

Parents at clinics with ROR programs were more likely to read with a child under the age of 6 months (OR=1.58, 95% CI, 1.05-2.38). Other literacy metrics trended toward improvement but none reached statistical significance. Paradoxically, the odds of parents reporting reading as a bedtime habit were decreased among those who participated in ROR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study finds mixed support of the effectiveness of ROR outside of academic settings. The apparent discrepancy between these results and those from national studies on ROR may be related to differences in respondent demographics and educational attainment or differences in program implementation and fidelity. We believe that the results will become clearer with future study as clinics are prospectively evaluated over time rather than being compared to non-ROR clinics in a cross-sectional snapshot.

摘要

背景

“伸出援手阅读”(ROR)项目通过鼓励家长定期与孩子分享书籍,改善儿童的发育情况并提高其入学准备程度。基层医疗服务提供者在每次儿童健康检查时提供适合其年龄的书籍以及关于阅读的预期指导。本研究评估了威斯康星州诊所中与参与ROR项目相关的家长对早期读写能力的态度和行为。

方法

对威斯康星州36家诊所中6个月至5岁儿童的家长进行了一项关于早期读写能力态度和行为的调查。其中10家诊所是已设立的ROR项目点(干预组),26家诊所已申请成为ROR项目但尚未启动该项目(对照组)。

结果

设有ROR项目的诊所的家长更有可能与6个月以下的儿童一起阅读(比值比=1.58,95%置信区间,1.05 - 2.38)。其他读写指标有改善的趋势,但均未达到统计学显著性。矛盾的是,参与ROR项目的家长将阅读作为睡前习惯的几率降低了。

结论

我们的研究发现,对于ROR项目在学术环境之外的有效性,支持的证据不一。这些结果与全国性ROR研究结果之间明显的差异可能与受访者的人口统计学特征和教育程度差异或项目实施及保真度差异有关。我们认为,随着未来对诊所进行前瞻性长期评估而非在横断面快照中与非ROR诊所进行比较,结果将变得更加清晰。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Clinic-Based Early Literacy Program in Changing Parent-Child Early Literacy Habits.一项基于诊所的早期读写能力项目在改变亲子早期读写习惯方面的有效性。
WMJ. 2016 Dec;115(6):300-5.
2
Factors Associated With Increased Reading Frequency in Children Exposed to Reach Out and Read.与参与“阅读起步走”项目的儿童阅读频率增加相关的因素
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children.评估一项基于诊所的项目,该项目旨在促进低收入城市地区有幼儿的家庭中的图书分享和睡前常规活动。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):459-65. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.459.
4
A pediatric clinic-based approach to early literacy promotion--experience in a well-baby clinic in Taiwan.儿科诊所为基础的早期读写促进方法——台湾一家婴幼儿保健诊所的经验。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 May;111(5):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.05.008. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
5
Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study of a Primary Care-Based Intervention Promoting Shared Reading During Infancy.探索性混合方法研究:基于初级保健的干预措施,促进婴儿期的共享阅读。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2022 Jul;61(7):475-484. doi: 10.1177/00099228221085825. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
More evidence for reach out and read: a home-based study.“伸手阅读”计划的更多证据:一项基于家庭的研究。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1248-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1248.
7
Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: a multicenter evaluation.一项支持大声朗读的初级保健干预措施的有效性:多中心评估。
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):209-15. doi: 10.1367/A04-110R.1.
8
Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference?基层医疗儿科中的扫盲促进:我们能有所作为吗?
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 2):927-34.
9
Improving early childhood literacy and school readiness through Reach Out and Read (ROR) program.通过“伸手阅读”(ROR)项目提高幼儿识字能力和入学准备水平。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u209772.w4137. eCollection 2016.
10
Child centered literacy orientation: a form of social capital?以儿童为中心的读写能力导向:一种社会资本形式?
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e55. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e55.

引用本文的文献

1
Reach Out and Read Implementation: A Scoping Review.伸出援手并阅读实施情况:范围综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Apr;23(3):520-549. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 2.