Suppr超能文献

评估一项基于诊所的项目,该项目旨在促进低收入城市地区有幼儿的家庭中的图书分享和睡前常规活动。

Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children.

作者信息

High P, Hopmann M, LaGasse L, Linn H

机构信息

Brown University School of Medicine, Women & Infants' Hospital, Providence, RI 02905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):459-65. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.459.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a program of anticipatory guidance in which pediatric residents and nurse practitioners in a continuity practice gave parents books for their young children along with developmentally appropriate educational materials describing why and how to share the books and promoting reading as part of a bedtime routine.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparison of 2 cross-sectional groups using consecutive, structured, face-to-face or telephone interviews of parents. One group was a historical control or a comparison group (group 1). The other was the intervention group (group 2), which included families who had received 2 books and educational materials for the children as part of the program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines.

SUBJECTS

Before the institution of the program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines, the parents in 51 families with healthy children 12 to 38 months of age who regularly attended continuity clinics conducted by the house staff were interviewed; these families constituted group 1. Group 1 included a low-income population of Hispanic, African American, and non-Hispanic white families. Group 2 included 100 families with similar sociodemographic characteristics with healthy 12- to 38-month-old children who had received 2 books and educational materials at all 6- to 36-month well-child visits as part of the program.

RESULTS

The intervention was found to be effective in promoting child-centered literacy activities. When asked openended questions, 4 (8%) of the parents in group 1 and 21 (21%) of the parents in group 2 said 1 of their child's 3 favorite activities included books (P=.04); 11 (22%) of the parents in group 1 and 42 (42%) of the parents in group 2 said 1 of their 3 favorite activities with their child was book sharing (P=.01); and 10 (20%) of the parents in group 1 and 35 (35%) of the parents in group 2 said that they share books 6 or 7 times a week at bedtime (P =.05). By mentioning 1 of these 3 important child-centered book-sharing activities, 17 (33%) of the parents in group 1 and 69 (69%) of the parents in group 2 (P <.001) demonstrated positive child-centered literacy orientation . A multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for parental education, ethnicity, and reading habits, as well as for the sex and age of the children, found child-centered literacy orientation more likely to be present in group 2 than in group 1 families, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-10.5; P<.001). Book sharing as part of a bedtime routine was more frequent in group 2 (mean+/-SD, 3.9+/-2.6 nights per week) than in group 1 (mean+/-SD, 2.5+/-2.7 nights per week; P=.002); however, no significant differences in prolonged bedtime struggles, parent-child co-sleeping, frequent night waking, or how children fell asleep were found between the groups. Instead, in multivariate analysis, bedtime struggles occurred more often with younger parents (P=.03) and fewer children at home (P=.02), while parent-child co-sleeping (P<.001) and frequent night waking (P=.04) were less likely to occur when children usually fell asleep alone in their own beds.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple and inexpensive intervention by pediatric house staff, consisting of the provision of children's books and educational materials at well-child visits, resulted in increased enjoyment of and participation in child-centered book-related activities in low-income families. Primary care providers (ie, physicians and nurse practitioners) serving underserved pediatric populations may have a unique opportunity to promote child-centered literacy in at-risk groups.

摘要

目的

评估一项预期指导计划,在该计划中,连续性医疗实践中的儿科住院医师和执业护士为家长提供适合其幼儿阅读的书籍,以及与发育阶段相适应的教育材料,这些材料描述了分享书籍的原因和方法,并将阅读作为睡前常规活动的一部分加以推广。

研究设计

通过对家长进行连续、结构化的面对面或电话访谈,比较两个横断面组。一组为历史对照组或比较组(第1组)。另一组为干预组(第2组),该组家庭作为推广书籍分享和睡前常规活动计划的一部分,已收到两本儿童书籍及教育材料。

研究对象

在推广书籍分享和睡前常规活动计划实施之前,对51个家庭中年龄在12至38个月、健康且定期到住院医师负责的连续性诊所就诊的孩子的家长进行了访谈;这些家庭构成第1组。第1组包括低收入的西班牙裔、非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人家庭。第2组包括100个具有相似社会人口学特征、孩子年龄在12至38个月且健康的家庭,这些家庭在孩子6至36个月的所有健康检查中均作为计划的一部分收到了两本儿童书籍及教育材料。

结果

发现该干预措施在促进以儿童为中心的识字活动方面是有效的。当被问到开放性问题时,第1组4名(8%)家长和第2组21名(21%)家长表示孩子最喜欢的三项活动中有一项是读书(P = 0.04);第1组11名(22%)家长和第2组42名(42%)家长表示与孩子最喜欢的三项活动中有一项是分享书籍(P = 0.01);第1组10名(20%)家长和第2组35名(35%)家长表示他们在睡前每周分享书籍6或7次(P = 0.05)。通过提及这三项以儿童为中心且重要的书籍分享活动中的一项,第1组17名(33%)家长和第2组69名(69%)家长(P < 0.001)表现出积极的以儿童为中心的识字倾向。一项多因素逻辑回归分析,对家长教育程度、种族、阅读习惯以及孩子的性别和年龄进行了控制,发现第2组家庭比第1组家庭更有可能出现以儿童为中心的识字倾向(优势比[OR]为4.7;95%置信区间[CI]为2.1 - 10.5;P < 0.001)。作为睡前常规活动一部分的书籍分享在第2组中更频繁(平均±标准差,每周3.9±2.6晚),而在第1组中则为(平均±标准差,每周2.5±2.7晚;P = 0.002);然而,两组之间在延长的睡前挣扎、亲子同睡、频繁夜醒或孩子入睡方式方面未发现显著差异。相反,在多变量分析中,睡前挣扎在年轻家长中更常出现(P = 0.03),且家中孩子较少时更常出现(P = 0.02),而当孩子通常独自在自己床上入睡时,亲子同睡(P < 0.001)和频繁夜醒(P = 0.04)发生的可能性较小。

结论

儿科住院医师实施的这项简单且低成本的干预措施,即在健康检查时提供儿童书籍和教育材料,使低收入家庭中以儿童为中心的与书籍相关活动的参与度和趣味性有所增加。为服务不足的儿科人群提供初级保健服务的人员(即医生和执业护士)可能有独特的机会在高危群体中促进以儿童为中心的识字能力发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验