Suppr超能文献

1983年《精神健康法》第63条是否剥夺了精神病患者的权利?判例法分析。

Does section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 disempower patients with mental illness? Analysis of the case law.

作者信息

Senasinghe Bhanuka

机构信息

The Ringles, Kent, UK.

出版信息

Med Leg J. 2018 Mar;86(1):19-22. doi: 10.1177/0025817217739736. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Abstract

In England and Wales, detained psychiatric inpatients are treated under section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983. This paper critically analyses the relevant law and considers the arbitrary distinctions between consent for treatments for mental illnesses and physical conditions, which may disempower patients with mental illness. Section 63 states that (for detained psychiatric patients) consent for medical treatment for patients' mental disorder is not required. The treating clinician responsible for a patient decides what this medical treatment entails. This article focuses on three main legal cases: B v Croydon Health Authority, Tameside and Glossop v CH and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust v RC and considers whether s 63 disempowers patients with mental illnesses.

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士,被拘留的精神科住院患者根据1983年《精神健康法》第63条接受治疗。本文对相关法律进行了批判性分析,并探讨了精神疾病治疗同意与身体疾病治疗同意之间的任意区分,这可能会削弱精神病患者的权力。第63条规定,(对于被拘留的精神科患者)无需获得患者对精神障碍治疗的同意。负责患者治疗的临床医生决定这种治疗包括哪些内容。本文重点关注三个主要法律案例:B诉克罗伊登卫生局案、泰姆赛德和格洛索普诉CH案以及诺丁汉郡医疗保健国民保健服务信托基金诉RC案,并探讨第63条是否会削弱精神病患者的权力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验