Beedie M A, Bluglass R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1613-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1613.
The case notes of all patients admitted in 1981 to two Birmingham psychiatric hospitals on compulsory orders for treatment were examined to determine whether, had the new "consent to treatment" proposals in the Mental Health (Amendment) Bill been in operation, a second opinion was necessary. This concluded that there will be difficulties in operating the arrangements to provide a second opinion, and the Government should reconsider the range of these proposals.
对1981年被强制收治到伯明翰两家精神病院的所有患者的病历进行了检查，以确定《精神健康（修正案）法案》中关于“治疗同意”的新提议若已实施，是否需要第二种意见。结论是，在安排提供第二种意见的操作上会存在困难，政府应重新考虑这些提议的范围。
