• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个包含体重指数、糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯的风险评分可预测 2 型糖尿病患者未来的血糖控制情况。

A risk score including body mass index, glycated haemoglobin and triglycerides predicts future glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):681-688. doi: 10.1111/dom.13148. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1111/dom.13148
PMID:29095564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5836941/
Abstract

AIM

To identify, predict and validate distinct glycaemic trajectories among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes treated in primary care, as a first step towards more effective patient-centred care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in two cohorts, using routinely collected individual patient data from primary care practices obtained from two large Dutch diabetes patient registries. Participants included adult patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes between January 2006 and December 2014 (development cohort, n = 10 528; validation cohort, n = 3777). Latent growth mixture modelling identified distinct glycaemic 5-year trajectories. Machine learning models were built to predict the trajectories using easily obtainable patient characteristics in daily clinical practice.

RESULTS

Three different glycaemic trajectories were identified: (1) stable, adequate glycaemic control (76.5% of patients); (2) improved glycaemic control (21.3% of patients); and (3) deteriorated glycaemic control (2.2% of patients). Similar trajectories could be discerned in the validation cohort. Body mass index and glycated haemoglobin and triglyceride levels were the most important predictors of trajectory membership. The predictive model, trained on the development cohort, had a receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.96 in the validation cohort, indicating excellent accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed model can effectively explain heterogeneity in future glycaemic response of patients with type 2 diabetes. It can therefore be used in clinical practice as a quick and easy tool to provide tailored diabetes care.

摘要

目的

在初级保健中识别、预测和验证新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的不同血糖轨迹,作为实现更以患者为中心的护理的第一步。

方法

我们在两个队列中进行了回顾性研究,使用来自两个大型荷兰糖尿病患者登记处的初级保健实践中常规收集的个体患者数据。参与者包括 2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间新诊断为 2 型糖尿病的成年患者(发展队列,n=10528;验证队列,n=3777)。潜在增长混合模型确定了不同的血糖 5 年轨迹。使用日常临床实践中易于获得的患者特征构建机器学习模型来预测轨迹。

结果

确定了三种不同的血糖轨迹:(1)稳定、适当的血糖控制(76.5%的患者);(2)血糖控制改善(21.3%的患者);和(3)血糖控制恶化(2.2%的患者)。在验证队列中也可以看出类似的轨迹。体重指数和糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯水平是轨迹成员的最重要预测因素。在验证队列中,基于发展队列训练的预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.96,表明准确性很高。

结论

开发的模型可以有效地解释 2 型糖尿病患者未来血糖反应的异质性。因此,它可以在临床实践中用作提供量身定制的糖尿病护理的快速简便工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbc/5836941/bc9e899ac81a/DOM-20-681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbc/5836941/83151bdfc48c/DOM-20-681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbc/5836941/bc9e899ac81a/DOM-20-681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbc/5836941/83151bdfc48c/DOM-20-681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbc/5836941/bc9e899ac81a/DOM-20-681-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A risk score including body mass index, glycated haemoglobin and triglycerides predicts future glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.一个包含体重指数、糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯的风险评分可预测 2 型糖尿病患者未来的血糖控制情况。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):681-688. doi: 10.1111/dom.13148. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
2
Distinct trajectories of HbA in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes from the DPV registry using a longitudinal group-based modelling approach.采用纵向基于群组的建模方法对 DPV 登记处新诊断的 2 型糖尿病患者的 HbA 进行的轨迹分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1468-1477. doi: 10.1111/dme.14103. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Evaluation of random plasma glucose for assessment of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.评估随机血糖用于2型糖尿病血糖控制的评估
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Sep;67(9):1353-1356.
4
Patterns of weight change after the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in Scotland and their relationship with glycaemic control, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.苏格兰2型糖尿病诊断后的体重变化模式及其与血糖控制、死亡率和心血管结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 26;6(7):e010836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010836.
5
Validity of random blood glucose as a predictor of the quality of glycaemic control by glycated haemoglobin in out-patient diabetic patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.肯尼亚国家医院门诊糖尿病患者中随机血糖作为糖化血红蛋白血糖控制质量预测指标的有效性
East Afr Med J. 2002 Sep;79(9):491-5. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v79i9.9122.
6
Relationship between number of contacts between previous dropouts with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals on glycaemic control: A cohort study in public primary health care.2 型糖尿病既往辍学者与医务人员之间接触次数与血糖控制的关系:一项在公立基层医疗保健中的队列研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Oct;13(5):468-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Effectiveness of insulin therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes in the Hoorn Diabetes Care System.霍恩糖尿病护理系统中胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病患者的有效性。
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):794-802. doi: 10.1111/dme.13110. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
Patient characteristics do not predict poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care.在初级保健机构接受治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,患者特征无法预测血糖控制不佳。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(6):541-5. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000032351.42772.e7.
9
HbA1c trajectories over 3 years in people with type 2 diabetes starting second-line glucose-lowering therapy: The prospective global DISCOVER study.HbA1c 轨迹在开始二线降糖治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中持续 3 年:前瞻性全球 DISCOVER 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jul;25(7):1890-1899. doi: 10.1111/dom.15050. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
10
Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis.英格兰 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、监测和治疗的差异:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 7;16(10):e1002942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942. eCollection 2019 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent class growth mixture modeling of HbA1C trajectories identifies individuals at high risk of developing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK Biobank.在英国生物银行中,对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)轨迹进行潜在类别增长混合模型分析可识别出2型糖尿病并发症高风险个体。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Sep 8;13(5):e004826. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004826.
2
Machine Learning Meets Meta-Heuristics: Bald Eagle Search Optimization and Red Deer Optimization for Feature Selection in Type II Diabetes Diagnosis.机器学习与元启发式算法相结合:用于II型糖尿病诊断特征选择的白头鹰搜索优化算法和马鹿优化算法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;11(8):766. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080766.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Medical histories.病史
Nature. 2016 Sep 8;537(7619):S52-3. doi: 10.1038/537S52a.
2
Ten-year hemoglobin A1c trajectories and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes & Aging Study.2型糖尿病患者十年糖化血红蛋白轨迹与结局:糖尿病与衰老研究
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Jan;31(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.07.023. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病的遗传结构
Disentangling Population Health Management Initiatives in Diabetes Care: A Scoping Review.
理清糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理举措:一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7512. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
4
Enhancement of Classifier Performance Using Swarm Intelligence in Detection of Diabetes from Pancreatic Microarray Gene Data.利用群体智能提升从胰腺微阵列基因数据中检测糖尿病的分类器性能
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Oct 22;8(6):503. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8060503.
5
Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病的精准亚分类:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00360-3.
6
Review: Machine learning in precision pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes-A promising future or a glimpse of hope?综述:机器学习在2型糖尿病精准药物治疗中的应用——前景光明还是仅一线希望?
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 29;9:20552076231203879. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203879. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
Multicomponent prediction of 2-year mortality and amputation in patients with diabetic foot using a random survival forest model: Uric acid, alanine transaminase, urine protein and platelet as important predictors.使用随机生存森林模型对糖尿病足患者2年死亡率和截肢情况进行多因素预测:尿酸、丙氨酸转氨酶、尿蛋白和血小板作为重要预测指标。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep 24;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14376.
8
A systematic review of clinical health conditions predicted by machine learning diagnostic and prognostic models trained or validated using real-world primary health care data.基于真实初级医疗保健数据进行训练或验证的机器学习诊断和预后模型预测的临床健康状况的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0274276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274276. eCollection 2023.
9
Data-Driven Identification of Long-Term Glycemia Clusters and Their Individualized Predictors in Finnish Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.基于数据驱动的芬兰2型糖尿病患者长期血糖聚类及其个体化预测因素的识别
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 5;15:13-29. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S380828. eCollection 2023.
10
Great diversity in the utilization and reporting of latent growth modeling approaches in type 2 diabetes: A literature review.2型糖尿病潜在增长模型方法的应用与报告存在巨大差异:一项文献综述。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 13;8(9):e10493. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10493. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Nature. 2016 Aug 4;536(7614):41-47. doi: 10.1038/nature18642. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
Diabetes: Still a geneticist's nightmare.糖尿病:仍是遗传学家的噩梦。
Nature. 2016 Aug 4;536(7614):37-8. doi: 10.1038/nature18906. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
Deep Patient: An Unsupervised Representation to Predict the Future of Patients from the Electronic Health Records.深度患者:一种从电子健康记录中预测患者未来的无监督表示。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26094. doi: 10.1038/srep26094.
6
High-sensitive troponin T is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in stable outpatients with type 2 diabetes (ZODIAC-37).高敏肌钙蛋白T与2型糖尿病稳定门诊患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率相关(ZODIAC-37研究)。
Am Heart J. 2016 Apr;174:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Automatically explaining machine learning prediction results: a demonstration on type 2 diabetes risk prediction.自动解释机器学习预测结果:以 2 型糖尿病风险预测为例。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2016 Mar 8;4:2. doi: 10.1186/s13755-016-0015-4. eCollection 2016.
8
Demographical, Clinical, and Psychological Characteristics of Users and Nonusers of an Online Platform for T2DM Patients (e-VitaDM-3/ZODIAC-44).2型糖尿病患者在线平台(e-VitaDM-3/ZODIAC-44)使用者与非使用者的人口统计学、临床和心理特征
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:6343927. doi: 10.1155/2016/6343927. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
9
Seven Questions for Personalized Medicine.个性化医疗的七个问题。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):999-1000. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7725.
10
Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer.BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变的类型及位置与乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 7;313(13):1347-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5985.