• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Red cell distribution width as a novel marker for predicting high-risk from upper gastro-intestinal bleeding patients.红细胞分布宽度作为预测上消化道出血患者高风险的新型标志物。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187158. eCollection 2017.
2
Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性和静脉曲张性上消化道出血中三种风险评分系统的前瞻性比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.
3
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血中 3 种评分系统的前瞻性比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):775-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
4
Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.无内镜检查结果的评分系统对预测上消化道出血患者预后的评估
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4.
5
A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.改良 Glasgow-Blatchford 评分提高了上消化道出血的风险分层:评分系统的前瞻性比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;36(8):782-9. doi: 10.1111/apt.12029. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
6
Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.急性上消化道出血的风险分层:AIMS65 评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德和罗克洛评分系统的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血风险分层评分系统的外部验证
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;36(2):105-112. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0740-x. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.
9
Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?低风险上消化道出血(UGIB)患者的安全出院:格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德出血评分的应用范围能否扩大?
Acute Med. 2011;10(4):176-81.
10
Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分在上消化道出血住院患者中预测临床结局和干预的表现。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of shock indexes and RDW/albumin ratio in upper gastrointestinal bleeding : Predicting adverse outcomes.休克指数和红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值在上消化道出血中的作用:预测不良结局
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01267-8.
2
Clinical and Biochemical Differences in Patients Having Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding on NSAIDs, Oral Anticoagulants, and Antiplatelet Therapy.使用非甾体抗炎药、口服抗凝剂和抗血小板治疗的非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的临床和生化差异
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 22;13(18):5622. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185622.
3
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科预测肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血患者死亡率的机器学习模型:一项回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;14(17):1919. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171919.
4
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测急诊上消化道出血的预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 8;11:1366715. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1366715. eCollection 2024.
5
Non-linear relationship between red blood cell distribution width and gastrointestinal bleeding risk in stroke patients: results from multi-center ICUs.卒中患者红细胞分布宽度与胃肠道出血风险的非线性关系:多中心重症监护病房的研究结果
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1346408. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1346408. eCollection 2024.
6
Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Risk Factor for 30/90-Day Mortality in Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.红细胞分布宽度作为胃肠道出血患者 30/90 天死亡率的风险因素:对 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 May;69(5):1740-1754. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08295-y. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
7
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.急性上消化道出血患者住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231207806. doi: 10.1177/10760296231207806.
8
Association of red cell distribution width/albumin ratio with intraoperative blood transfusion in cervical cancer patients.红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值与宫颈癌患者术中输血的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 18;17(11):e0277481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277481. eCollection 2022.
9
Association between red blood cell distribution width and mortality in patients with metastatic brain tumors: A retrospective single-center cohort study.转移性脑肿瘤患者红细胞分布宽度与死亡率之间的关联:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 7;12:985263. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985263. eCollection 2022.
10
International Normalized Ratio-to-Albumin Ratio as a Novel Marker of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Severity.国际标准化比值与白蛋白比值作为上消化道出血严重程度的新型标志物。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 13;2022:1172540. doi: 10.1155/2022/1172540. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship of Hematoma Growth to Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.高血压性脑出血患者血肿生长与红细胞分布宽度的关系
Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(3):368-373. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.16136-15.1.
2
Gastrointestinal Bleeding.胃肠道出血
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016 May;34(2):309-25. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Red blood cell distribution width: A simple parameter with multiple clinical applications.红细胞分布宽度:一个简单的参数,具有多种临床应用。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(2):86-105. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2014.992064. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
4
Effect of exhaustive running exercise on red blood cell distribution width.力竭性跑步运动对红细胞分布宽度的影响。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(2):e29-31. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0749.
5
Admission red cell distribution width: a novel predictor of massive transfusion after injury.入院时红细胞分布宽度:创伤后大量输血的一种新预测指标。
Am Surg. 2014 Jul;80(7):685-9.
6
Red cell distribution width as a bleeding predictor after percutaneous coronary intervention.红细胞分布宽度作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出血的预测指标。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jul;166(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 16.
7
The relationship between red cell distribution width with erythropoietin resistance in iron replete hemodialysis patients.铁补充充分的血液透析患者红细胞分布宽度与红细胞生成素抵抗的关系。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Apr;24(3):e25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
8
Management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: current policies and future perspectives.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的处理:现行策略与未来展望。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 21;18(11):1202-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1202.
9
Elevated red cell distribution width predicts poor outcome in young patients with community acquired pneumonia.红细胞分布宽度升高预示着社区获得性肺炎年轻患者预后不良。
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 11;15(4):R194. doi: 10.1186/cc10355.
10
Serum antioxidants and inflammation predict red cell distribution width in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study I.血清抗氧化剂和炎症可预测老年女性红细胞分布宽度:妇女健康和老龄化研究 I。
Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;29(5):600-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

红细胞分布宽度作为预测上消化道出血患者高风险的新型标志物。

Red cell distribution width as a novel marker for predicting high-risk from upper gastro-intestinal bleeding patients.

作者信息

Lee Kyeong Ryong, Park Sang O, Kim Sin Young, Hong Dae Young, Kim Jong Won, Baek Kwang Je, Shin Dong Hyuk, Lee Young Hwan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187158. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187158
PMID:29095860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5667835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) patients, early risk stratification allows appropriate therapy that may be helpful for reducing morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the efficacy of red-cell distribution width (RDW) for prediction of high-risk in UGIB patients.

METHODS

We conducted a clinical retrospective observational study based on data for UGIB patients from 2012 to 2013. The primary outcome was the high-risk UGIB, defined as those who required urgent intervention and/or 30-days mortality. RDW was categorized into four quartiles: Q1 (≤12.8%), Q2 (12.9-14.4%), Q3 (14.5-16.5%), and Q4 (≥16.6%), and multivariable analysis was performed after adjustment of multiple other risk factor. We also evaluated the efficacy of addition of RDW scores to the Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score (PRS) and the Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) scoring system.

RESULTS

Of 360 UGIB patients, 229 (63.6%) were high risk. In multivariable analysis, Q3 and Q4 were strongly associated with high risk; odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval) was 3.144 (1.250-7.905) and 4.182 (1.483-11.790) respectively (all p < 0.05). For lower GBS score group (≤ 6), the incidence of high risk was higher in Q4 (30%) and Q3 (20%) than in Q2 (12.5%) and Q1 (11.4%). For lower PRS group (≤ 2), the incidence of high-risk was higher in Q4 (73.7%) and Q3 (57.1%) than in Q1 (35.4%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed higher discrimination power in PRS + RDW (Area Under Curve [AUC] = 0.749) than PRS (AUC = 0.715) alone (p = 0.036). Otherwise GBS + RDW (AUC = 0.873) did not show a significant higher discrimination power than the GBS (AUC = 0.864) alone (p = 0.098).

CONCLUSIONS

For UGIB patients, a high RDW (≥ 14.5%) was strongly associated with high risk UGIB. In practice, the combination of RDW with the PRS scoring indexes may increase the accuracy of risk stratification.

摘要

背景

在上消化道出血(UGIB)患者中,早期风险分层有助于采取适当治疗,这可能有助于降低发病率和死亡率。

目的

评估红细胞分布宽度(RDW)对预测UGIB患者高风险的有效性。

方法

我们基于2012年至2013年UGIB患者的数据进行了一项临床回顾性观察研究。主要结局是高风险UGIB,定义为需要紧急干预和/或30天死亡率的患者。RDW被分为四个四分位数:Q1(≤12.8%)、Q2(12.9 - 14.4%)、Q3(14.5 - 16.5%)和Q4(≥16.6%),在调整多个其他风险因素后进行多变量分析。我们还评估了将RDW评分添加到内镜前Rockall评分(PRS)和格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分(GBS)系统中的有效性。

结果

在360例UGIB患者中,229例(63.6%)为高风险。在多变量分析中,Q3和Q4与高风险密切相关;比值比(95%置信区间)分别为3.144(1.250 - 7.905)和4.182(1.483 - 11.790)(均p < 0.05)。对于较低GBS评分组(≤6),Q4(30%)和Q3(20%)的高风险发生率高于Q2(12.5%)和Q1(11.4%)。对于较低PRS组(≤2),Q4(7