Suppr超能文献

通过间接互动做出的知觉判断更佳:来自联合定位任务的证据。

Perceptual judgments made better by indirect interactions: Evidence from a joint localization task.

作者信息

Voinov Pavel Valeryevich, Sebanz Natalie, Knoblich Günther

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187428. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Others' perceptual judgments tend to have strong effects on our own, and can improve perceptual judgments when task partners engage in communication. The present study investigated whether individuals benefit from others' perceptual judgments in indirect interactions, where outcomes of individual decisions can be observed in a shared environment. Participants located a target in a 2D projection of a 3D container either from two complementary viewpoints (Experiment 1), or from a single viewpoint (Experiment 2). Uncertainty about the target location was high on the front-back dimension and low on the left-right dimension. The results showed that pairs of participants benefitted from taking turns in providing judgments. When each member of the pair had access to one complementary perspective, the pair achieved the same level of accuracy as when the two individuals had access to both complimentary perspectives and better performance than when the two individuals had access to only one perspective. These findings demonstrate the important role of a shared environment for successful integration of perceptual information while highlighting limitations in assigning appropriate weights to others' judgments.

摘要

他人的感知判断往往会对我们自己的判断产生强烈影响,并且当任务伙伴进行交流时,还能改善感知判断。本研究调查了在间接互动中,个体是否能从他人的感知判断中受益,在这种间接互动中,个体决策的结果可以在共享环境中被观察到。参与者在一个三维容器的二维投影中,从两个互补视角(实验1)或单一视角(实验2)定位一个目标。目标位置在前后维度上的不确定性高,而在左右维度上的不确定性低。结果表明,参与者成对轮流提供判断时会从中受益。当一对中的每个成员都能获取一个互补视角时,这一对所达到的准确率与两人都能获取两个互补视角时相同,且比两人都只能获取一个视角时表现更好。这些发现证明了共享环境在成功整合感知信息方面的重要作用,同时也凸显了在为他人的判断赋予适当权重时存在的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c90/5667753/4204033383d1/pone.0187428.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptual judgments made better by indirect interactions: Evidence from a joint localization task.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187428. eCollection 2017.
2
Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback.
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:116-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
3
Social modulation of spatial judgment: The case of line bisection task.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jun;167:24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
4
Doing what others see: visuomotor conversion to informational social influence.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1291-303. doi: 10.1037/a0031572. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
5
The eyes and ears of status: how status colors perceptual judgment.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):570-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167211431166. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Own-other differences in the realism of some metacognitive judgments.
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Feb;48(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00565.x.
7
The influence of social context and body size on action judgments for self and others.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1385-95. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000089. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
Is it always me first? Effects of self-tagging on third-person perspective-taking.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1100-17. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000078. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
Egocentric biases in comparative volume judgments of rooms.
J Vis. 2016;16(6):2. doi: 10.1167/16.6.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms for mutual support in motor interactions.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82138-y.
2
Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jul 22;7(7):191974. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191974. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback.
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:116-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Social influence protects collective decision making from equality bias.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb;42(2):164-72. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000145. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
2
Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3835-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421692112. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
4
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):931-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797612436816. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1310-21. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0416.
6
The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):20947-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108155108. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-making.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):3-8. doi: 10.1037/a0025708. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 31;108(22):9020-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008636108. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Optimally interacting minds.
Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1185718.
10
Behavior. Decisions made better.
Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1022-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1194920.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验