Taylor J, Walsh T, Worthington H, Brocklehurst P, Pemberton M N, Glenny A M
Oral Medicine Department, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School.
Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Rd., Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Br Dent J. 2017 Dec;223(9):729-732. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.893. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
All clinicians in medicine and dentistry aim to deliver evidence-based practice; however, it is widely recognised that the current evidence base for interventions in oral medicine, as with many other specialties, is of a low quality. The highest level of evidence is considered to be the systematic review and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Oral Health group produce high quality systematic reviews, however, despite the large number of trials carried out for treatments in oral medicine, the results are often not able to be utilised to guide clinical care due to the various methodological limitations of the trials including the heterogeneity of outcome measures used. To improve the strength of the evidence base this will need to change. The Comet initiative aims to support the development of core outcome sets which are used to allow homogeneity of outcome measures in trials and therefore will allow pooling of data for meta-analysis in future systematic reviews. This paper explores the complexities involved in producing evidence for oral medicine interventions and introduces an approach for developing core outcome sets in oral medicine.
医学和牙科领域的所有临床医生都致力于提供循证医学实践;然而,人们普遍认识到,与许多其他专业一样,目前口腔医学干预措施的证据基础质量较低。最高级别的证据被认为是系统评价和荟萃分析。Cochrane协作网和Cochrane口腔健康小组开展了高质量的系统评价,然而,尽管针对口腔医学治疗进行了大量试验,但由于试验存在各种方法学局限性,包括所使用的结局指标的异质性,其结果往往无法用于指导临床护理。为了提高证据基础的强度,这种情况需要改变。COMET计划旨在支持核心结局指标集的开发,这些指标集用于使试验中的结局指标具有同质性,从而能够在未来的系统评价中汇总数据进行荟萃分析。本文探讨了为口腔医学干预措施提供证据所涉及的复杂性,并介绍了一种在口腔医学中开发核心结局指标集的方法。