Michalowsky Bernhard, Kostev Karel, Hoffmann Wolfgang, Bohlken Jens
Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE) e.V. in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Standort Rostock/Greifswald, AG Translationale Versorgungsforschung, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Deutschland.
QuintilesIMS, Arbeitsgruppe Epidemiologie, Darmstädter Landstraße 1089, 60598, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul;51(5):517-522. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1336-x. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
In 2013 and 2014 dementia diagnoses in general practitioner (GP) practices dramatically increased, a phenomenon most likely caused by monetary incentives.
Which GP practice-dependent indicators are associated with the increase in dementia diagnoses and are thus decisive factors for the way in which physicians in GP practices respond to monetary incentives?
We performed a retrospective, longitudinal analysis of 856 GP practices. The increase in dementia diagnoses was calculated by comparing the number of newly diagnosed persons with dementia (PWD) per GP practice in 2012 and 2014. The indicators of the ability to respond included in this study were (1) practice size (number of patients treated per year), (2) geriatric focus (number of patients ≥70 years), and (3) willingness to diagnose (number of newly diagnosed PWD in 2012) and treat (number of antidementia prescriptions in 2012). The analysis of the association between the ability to respond and the indicators was performed using logistic regression.
The changes in the number of diagnoses in GP practices differed greatly. The incidence increase was associated with a higher number of patients treated in a practice and a higher number of patients aged 70 years or older.
Physicians in general practices with a larger number of cases, especially of geriatric patients, showed a higher willingness to respond to monetary incentives introduced to improve the care of geriatric patients. Whether these monetary incentives also lead to an improvement in the quality of care and the lives of PWD should be examined in future analyses.
2013年和2014年,全科医生(GP)诊所的痴呆症诊断数量大幅增加,这一现象很可能是由金钱激励措施导致的。
哪些与全科医生诊所相关的指标与痴呆症诊断数量的增加有关,从而是全科医生诊所的医生对金钱激励措施做出反应方式的决定性因素?
我们对856家全科医生诊所进行了回顾性纵向分析。通过比较2012年和2014年每家全科医生诊所新诊断的痴呆症患者(PWD)数量来计算痴呆症诊断数量的增加。本研究纳入的反应能力指标包括:(1)诊所规模(每年治疗的患者数量);(2)老年病重点(70岁及以上患者数量);(3)诊断意愿(2012年新诊断的PWD数量)和治疗意愿(2012年抗痴呆药物处方数量)。使用逻辑回归分析反应能力与指标之间的关联。
全科医生诊所的诊断数量变化差异很大。发病率的增加与诊所治疗的患者数量较多以及70岁及以上患者数量较多有关。
病例数量较多,尤其是老年患者数量较多的全科医生诊所的医生,对为改善老年患者护理而引入的金钱激励措施表现出更高的反应意愿。这些金钱激励措施是否也会导致痴呆症患者护理质量和生活质量的改善,应在未来的分析中进行研究。